this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
307 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29789 readers
2219 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] espentan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

A US president can, apparently, do whatever he wants without consequences.

If only a president that wasn't a moronic, self serving asshole had thought of that trick.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

You just need a majority in congress nearly entirely owned by your interests who would prefer not to do anything about it. Party is irrelevant.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

Just like at least a dozen other impeachable offenses.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 22 points 6 hours ago

So is raping kids. Yet he is still in office.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 hours ago

Sorry, did he say "where are the Epstein Files?" I could've sworn...

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Then impeach him.

If you're a US citizen remember that each time you pay your taxes you are just paying Donald Trump.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Neoliberal Democrats in power don't have the stones to do that kind of bold action.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Don't remind me. If I didn't know the state would come take my fucking house away I'd not be paying s penny in taxes, but alas the fuckers have me by the short and curlies. Not much choice.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You can stop having federal taxes taken out of your paycheck. Just set whatever amount aside in an interest bearing account until tax time next year and pay it then.

You can at least deny them the money until then, and maybe earn a little interest on it instead.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 59 minutes ago

Just set whatever amount aside in an interest bearing account

An interest-bearing account you say? I haven't seen that in years.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

All those people saying that the money would just go to their friends and family if you kill them. That and more regardless...

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No shit?

Exactly what happened is that Trump filed a bogus lawsuit then his crony at the Justice Department arranged for a bogus "settlement" so that Trump could get a slush fund from which to dole out money to other cronies.

It's blatant and overt fraud, and both of them should go to prison.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So the idiot Roberts court ruled that he can't be sued, but he can still sue others? What could possibly go wrong?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

Not even sue others, he pretty much sued himself

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 55 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Trump does 5 impeachable things every day.

But it will only cause him to be impeached if the GOP turds in the house and the senate grow a conscience and get onboard with, ya know, upholding the Constitution.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Recent polls have Democrats winning in a landslide in November.

And we're still months away with Trump fucking up more every day.

And not just ruining America, but making the lives of his supporters harder and then saying he doesn't care.

Trump forgot the first rule of dictators, never openly betray your base.

The less committed Trump supporters are actually abandoning him. And that's wild. It gives me hope.

The true believers will never leave, but there aren't enough of them to force everyone else to follow. They will try, but likely fail, much like Orban failed in Hungary.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 34 minutes ago

Even if we get a Democratic majority they could still easily disappoint us if the wrong ones win their primaries.

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Elons ex just whistleblowed that Elon stole the 2024 election for Trump. Trump also said it in the start, some quote about Elon knowing election computers.

I even believe that he created in 2020, and that is how he is so sure biden did too. Because how else could he lose when he was cheating? But i think he learned that he needs to cheat more 🤷‍♂️

If ANYONE think there will be a democratic landslide while Trump and his cronies have the power, they are a fool. America is less of a democracy than Russia by now.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Elons ex just whistleblowed that Elon stole the 2024 election for Trump

I haven't seen this, do you have a link?

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So the source is a tiktok of a girl putting her makeup on?

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

The source is elons ex girlfriend putting her make-up on, yes. I agree it's fucking tacky, but that's how she chose to share it.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

2024 was still close enough that rigging things looked somewhat believable.

2026 is looking like believable will not be an option.

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They literally fired and replaced anyone in the system that has previously disrupted their attempts. Just like they fired and replaced anyone in the top military brass who would have stopped an invasion of Iran. They fon't care about appearances, they care about getting their mass surveillance/execution system completed before the rioting begins.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

They did. But open corruption is not appealing to any except the most devout Trump supporter.

The other factor is that they fired anyone competent.

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 minutes ago

they fired anyone competent.

Who do you think did that, Trump himself? Or Peter Thiel who funded the campaign, and is right now setting up the worlds most extensive surveillance/execution system?

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump forgot the first rule of dictators, never openly betray your base.

This doesn't hold true for Trump because his base doesn't have the mental capacity the good lord gave to turkeys: Trump can hurt them and insult them all he wants, they come back for more.

Don't bet on the Democrats winning the midterms too fast: if Trump and his henchmen don't rig the elections, I wouldn't put it past his dumb MAGA minions to pull a rabbit out of the hat.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

20-30% of the voting population will never wake up, but signs are saying that the less committed are actually waking up.

Also, Trump's die hard supporters have never turned out in droves when he isn't directly on the ballot.

Trump is still trying to rig things, but you need a believable amount of votes in the first place to pull that off.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Recent polls have Democrats winning in a landslide in November.

And luckily the republicans won't have rigged it.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

There's only so much you can do to rig an election. You need it to be close enough that you can lie believably. The polls say that it will not be. At that point you need to basically launch a military occupation to keep power. Trump will certainly try it, but I'm not sure that he's still popular enough to pull it off.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Currently, Trump is openly calling for Republicans lead states to explicitly gerrymander their congressional districts, and it's being allowed by both Congress and the Supreme Court. At the same time, Virginia had a popularly passed set of congressional district maps struck down by the very same court.

Quite literally, every branch of government is putting their thumb on the scale for trump. Every branch of the government is corrupt beyond repair, and needs to be removed and restructred in such a way that this can never happen again.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

The thing about a gerrymander is that it can backfire, you're diluting votes of both your opponents and your supporters. If you get the ratios wrong, or say, lose a lot of support from the less committed side of your base, then the gerrymandered district goes to the opposition.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

At the same time, Virginia had a popularly passed set of congressional district maps struck down by the very same court.

I believe it was struck down by the Virginia Supreme Court, was appealed, but hasn't gone to the US Supreme Court yet.

Actually, never mind, I just looked and apparently on 5/15, the US Supreme Court declined to take the case. So yeah, they didn't "strike it down" per se, but the outcome is essentially the same.

I fucking hate this shit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

They also used to need to hide their corruption. Now they just do it in the open.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

At that point you need to basically launch a military occupation to keep power.

Like armed, masked people snatching people? Or like the people he just gave a bunch of money to, or like the forces he used on people for a photo-op?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly like that, but he needs an order of magnitude more thugs to actually pull it off.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So if it does happen, will you say something like "we couldn't have done anything to stop it", "how could we have known" or "the only thing we can do now is to protest"?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

No, When Trump tries to retain power, it will result in a civil war. Not a "clean" North v South war, but a quagmire of sectarian violence.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

It only takes a few mean-looking white supremacist types loitering in front of the polling station to turn away a lot of not-so-white people. Or better, masked ICE agents.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago

A few at each polling station maybe, or a few dozen. And despite the numbers, Trump doesn't have enough.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 6 hours ago

So that's like 20 of them now? Good to know.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 39 points 12 hours ago

Every day trump wakes up is an impeachable offense.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

And the worst part is, they still haven't released all the Epstein files. Also, Donald Trump raped children.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And?

They are never going to remove him from office. Full stop.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm hoping he takes a cue from one of his heroes, Adolf Hitler, and his last act in office is one of redemption and heroism.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago

Add it to the list...

[–] AgaveInMyAss@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago