Work in the public sector.
Our work adds value to the lives of people but not in any financial sense.
So based on that, 0% of the work we do creates any financial value
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Work in the public sector.
Our work adds value to the lives of people but not in any financial sense.
So based on that, 0% of the work we do creates any financial value
I used to work for a large corporation. I was on a team of 10 people. My whole job was to run three queries and copy and paste it to excel and send it off on tuesdays. I would do it on Tuesday mornings and it took me about an hour.
My teammates had similar tasks. They were in charge of one report or handout and they would automate so much it would take them about an hour to do.
One day our manager tells us we are getting a new team member because our work load is going to increase substantially.
The new person got their own report. And they messaged me once, “I am done with my report what do I do next?”
I responded, “wait until next week and do the same report”
I was at the company for ten years.
I left the tech world and now work for a medical device company. All I can say is I'm extremely happy to be working from home with the 3 hours of meetings and 1-2 hours of work I have each week. And the director wants to get me a junior because I'm managing so many projects. Hell, I'm actively drumming up work and it takes weeks for anything to happen.
Sure I took a bit of a pay cut, but I'm not on call 1 week a month and I'm not being run ragged everyday either.
I used to be in medical device, be aware everything takes forever. Minor changes were atleast 6 months. I added in a step to have an operator look at some component under a microscope for damage to increase yield. Basically if the component was damaged it wasn't detectable till much later and cost went from about 5 dollars to about 800. It took 9 months to implement and we didn't even have to buy anything or hire anyone.
I'm definitely aware now. We're global and that means even more overhead with multiple regulatory bodies. Our products are several years to their first market, and at least another year for the global rollout.
And I'm just over here writing software and trying to reduce toil for these insane people who hand-roll excel files like they're databases and applications.
If your company was anything like mine find a group of people who you work well with in your normal departments and try to use them whenever possible. For example basically every document released needed a signature from manufacturing, R&D, regulatory, quality. Technically I would contact the manager of each department with quick overview and ask them to assign someone, but I would also include a quick note like "I would appreciate if John could be assigned to this if he has availability". Typically I would also typically of already contacted John and checked if he had availability and if it was within his ability, typically they were willing but sometimes was told stuff like "I would love to but I'm on vacation for 2 weeks starting Monday" or "I could but I haven't work on fault tolerance stack up analysis since college, I recommend Tim as he can give a more thorough review of your analysis". All good things to know before starting out on a project.
Also if you need something done quickly prepare ahead and alert everyone and typically people will comply but don't use this too often. For example one time we had an improvement project, we were told we could use a Friday but report had to be completed and released before Friday morning or people's surgeries would need to be delayed(long story how we got in that situation). I wrote the whole report the week before assuming everything went smoothly, only thing missing was the specific numbers from the test. I sent it out the week before and asked for a pre-review so everyone agreed on the verbiage. I wrote a macro script to do all the analysis and verified it work with previous data sets compared to manual analysis. Test took 6 hours to run, finishing of report took 10 minutes, sent out for review to all signatories and cc'd my boss, the director and the dvp emphasizing urgency. Dvp replied all throwing his weight behind it. Everything was approved and released with an hour to spare before eod. I only did that sort of thing 5 times over 8 years in that role so people respected my request. I know people who said everything was urgent and no matter what the real priority was it got put into the normal queue for most people. Typically I budgeted a week just for reviews in my timeline, we got that one done in about 35 minutes.
Did you have to pretend to be busy the rest of the time? Not having anything to do 99% of the time sounds dreadful.
My company is forcing people to use ai and even watching tokens to be sure people are participating.
Companies don’t give a fuck about you.
My company is forcing people to use ai and even watching tokens to be sure people are participating.
That sounds like a great use case for Agentic AI. Write your prompt to be something like: "Create a process that will consume X number of tokens per day. Scatter the requests throughout the workday with no more than 20 minutes between requests. Discard any generated results. Run Monday through Friday from 8AM to 5PM".
Boss: Are you using AI in your daily work as we are requiring?
Worker: "Not only am I using it, I've automated one of my most annoying required tasks increasing my productivity!"
I'm pretty blessed to have landed at a small company that is super healthy, highly profitable, and takes care of their employees very well. Not just in salary compensation, but benefits, equity, true unlimited sick/PTO, etc.
I work at a smaller company, everyone has to carry their weight, and the owner pays about double the industry average. He always says I would rather have shit equipment and good techs, than good equipment and shit techs. Obviously we want both, but if push comes to shove, you pay for the right people, because that’s harder to replace than a machine.
I don't know the actual percentage, but I know my company genuinely cares for its workforce, and richly rewards creativity and good work - and not just in the form of money.
It's also one of the rare companies that cares about the community it operates in. It's the only company I've worked for where one of the points in the annual presentation about the state of the company is how much the company contributed to the community in the form of taxes. Like, it genuinely cares about giving back. For real!
That's one of the many reason why I hope to retire there.
Since we have audited overhead rates, about 40%-45% of company revenue goes into direct salaries for my group. When possible, the company will lower that to 33% by charging more.
Quite a bit. We have an annual 7-10% bonus each year of profit sharing, plus they just implemented a $3 raise company wide last year. The benefits and pay are top notch, even for shop employees like me. I'm making 36.15 an hour with a fuckton of overtime and double time on Sundays if I work all 7 days in a week, which is the best salary I've ever made. My bills are cheap af, like ~300 per month after we split the mortgage and utilities 3 ways at home so pushing 80k+ after overtime is great for us as I'm doin home reno stuff and getting married soon.
The benefits and health insurance are great too, if there's anything beyond a copay then the company pays for it. It's basically similar to what I imagine socialized healthcare would be like. Pretty generous PTO policy too.
We're one of (if not the only) manufacturer of certain industrial electrical systems that can do what we do. Privately owned by one person.
Everyone's salary can basically be looked up at my job, including bonuses (strong union). We generate electricity for a ton of people. The value added for us would be more in line with improving tech/safety for engineers like me. Millions go into that annually if you count preventative maintenance, equipment and things like that. Big profits on high generation times can be paid out in generating bonuses spread among operations. I'm happy where I'm at, I recognize that I'm in the minority in that regard.
Quite a lot. We get sound salaries, a great bonus plan and compelling perks.
$1mil for one item that we sell roughly 8 of a year. The other half of the factory makes a $5k-$20k item that we sell thousands of per year.
Average salary $50k.
So idk something like 0.0001%
This makes no sense. Assuming the two factory halves have equal revenue:
$16,000,000 × 0.0001% = $160 [edit: i mean, $16]
I didn't do the math, I was being facetious. I just meant to say some incredibly tiny fraction of 1%
Even the entire 1% is $160,000.