Maybe that's the goal. Freeze the front in Ukraine and turn global public opinion against them with video of Ukrainian drones striking Moscow high rise apartment buildings.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ukraine likely wouldn’t fall for that bait. Keep targeting legitimate military targets.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That high rise looks to be very expensive. Odds are a few people that hang out there are associated with Russia's invasion. This makes them a legitimate target already.

Putting anti-air on it is stupid because it clearly confirms it as a legitimate target.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

Drone: "Flying low and in between buildings..."

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Moscow turns high-rises into valid military targets.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Can buildings withstand the vibration and pushback of such weapons? And how do they stock them with ammunition? Is this shit sustainable in any way?

I'd say: Don't bomb those buildings - just let some drones cruise over them and let the AA do the destruction to the structure.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if Russia never fires them it means they’re not in use elsewhere.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Attrition, but they do it to themselves... Clever orcs, those ruzzkis.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

yeah, most buildings can withstand that. AA don't have recoil like howitzers. AA rockets and lasers even none at all.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

New Targets Acquired

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Wait weren't drones supposed to make helicopters obsolete!???