this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24381 readers
201 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20260528114303/https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs

Why it matters: Companies that rushed to embrace AI are now confronting ballooning IT costs, uncertain productivity gains and growing employee skepticism.

Driving the news: Microsoft canceled most of its Claude Code licenses, in part over costs, according to The Verge, and Uber's COO said AI costs are getting "harder to justify."

An AI consultant tells Axios one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on Claude licenses for employees.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

Consumer sentiment around AI is also nosediving, and employees are rebelling against the use of the technology at work. 

What they're saying: The enterprise is undergoing a "healthy swing" away from AI overuse — or "tokenmaxxing," the push to burn as many AI tokens as possible — Ali Ansari, CEO of model training firm Micro1, told Axios.

Ansari hopes this correction will push companies toward more efficient AI use.
While the market views these tools as working equally well across the enterprise, Ansari says "the reality of AI right now is that it only works for coding."
That disconnect can drive up IT bills without leading to high return on investment in agents, he said. 

Friction point: Corporate AI adoption is running into four unique problems.

Use cases: "Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company," Sophia Velastegui, CEO of Velastegui Ventures and former chief AI officer at Microsoft told Axios. Instead, they should focus on using AI to drive revenue.

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather. That gets expensive fast: Enterprise AI plans are not truly 'all you can eat,' and even simple chatbot queries can carry heavy token costs.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 77 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Most people default to automating tasks they dislike rather than tasks most valuable to the company

CEO complains about class struggle

I don't get it. Why wouldn't the employees like doing valuable things? Have you diverged your own interests from theirs?

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Me years ago when I spent 2 weeks writing a one off script to accomplish something that would take me 4 hours to do manually because I had nothing better to do at work

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 79 points 3 days ago

$500 million accidental bill, meanwhile people get fired for a few minutes of """time theft"""

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 63 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Costs: One CTO told Axios that employees were using AI models to check the weather.

fuck yeah

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet? is it warm yet?

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

The thermostat is on the other side of the room, ergo I must burn AI tokens to use electricity to increase the global temperature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please, the tokenmaxxing meta can do better than this. Put a temperature sensor outside a data center running the AI then have the AI check temperature changes in real time and write essays on why it might be changing. As it works the data center rises temps and it has to write more as temps change. Self reinforcing token burning.

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 20 points 3 days ago

You need to have another ai agent editing the essays and then another agent writing detailed critiques of each essay

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm going through a tokenmaxxing phase rn. Profitcels about to get slopmogged, while I'm based and clankerpilled.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

chatPPB find a way to say "hell yeah GOOD post" in no fewer that 69420 words

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 61 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

This literally made me laugh out loud.

Companies are citing AI's ability to automate jobs as a cause for layoffs, though Anuj Kapur, CEO of CloudBees, told Axios that workforce cuts may simply be "the only lever they can pull" to offset their AI bills.

"Well, we're firing you all."

"To replace us with AI??"

"No it's because we spent too much on AI and now we can't afford you or AI"

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 44 points 3 days ago

they could use their money more efficiently and increase productivity by giving it straight to nvidia for GPUs so the employees can game on company time

[–] egg1918@hexbear.net 65 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe I should be using AI at work🤔

Don’t you want to know the last digit of pi?

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 63 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Throwing AI licenses at the wall and seeing what sticks (or what Velastegui calls the "thousand flowers bloom" approach) isn't leading to tangible returns, she said.

costanza-maoist Make sure to not use chinese ai though because that would be unamerican.

Watch western AI companies just buy chinese AI and then rebrand it as american.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they don't even have to buy it, deepseek is free (gratis). i think it only has use based restrictions for military stuff.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

deepseek does horny stuff??

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

3.4 You will not use the Services to generate, express or promote content or a chatbot that:

(5) is pornographic, obscene, or sexually explicit (e.g., sexual chatbots);

Volcelseek

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

Data: When enterprises are hesitant to give AI agents unfettered access to proprietary data, those agents become less effective, Josh Pantony, CEO of Boosted.ai, which focuses on AI tools for finance, told Axios.

bruh

[–] hotspur@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago

I’ve read that Anthropic’s yearly revenue is in the single/double digit billions (want to say 13.5, but I’m not sure) so this company’s error would account for 4% (if my 13.5b is the number) of their yearly revenue in one month…

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably would have been more environmentally friendly to just set up 500M in dollar bills on fire

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

In car tires even.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago

You forgot the most relevant one!

data-laughing

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Many businesses are so unbelievably gullible when it comes to AI. They throw all existing performance indicators out of the window and only chase AI adoption about all else. Doesn't matter if it makes the employee more productive. Those burning many tokens are commended, those not using enough AI are fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

“World calculator” becomes a more apt description for these things by the day when I try to use them at work I swear to god

Why it matters: Companies that rushed to embrace AI are now confronting ballooning IT costs, uncertain productivity gains and growing employee skepticism.

Sounds like companies fear that they are losing control over the employee 🤔

Here’s the thing that a lot of people in corporate don’t understand about deadlines: They are completely arbitrary and often completely fictional. They know this too! Because every time a deadline is missed, nothing happens. We call it a “miss” and designate a scapegoat who takes on a majority of the blame.

When people/the media constantly double down on the productivity gains, what they aren’t mentioning is that productivity in and of itself is vibes based. The economy is vibes based.

I am going to try (but will probably fail) to enjoy my weekend before I come back to this bullshit

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tax the shit out of these morons. They and their companies are too stupid to be responsible for that much money. Take it away from them, and give it to the people. Start by forcing companies to kick back 50% of their gross profits to their employees.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

They are basically setting money on fire. Taxing it won't do much. What's needed is the Chinese model where businesses can't fire workers to replace them with AI. That law is just as much for the protection of businesses as it is for the protection of workers.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

yeah if i had unlimited token access i would just make it write my emails and documentation which it is semi good at rather than writing bad code that takes the same amount of time to double check as writing it myself. that might count as a productivity boost but it's probably not what they are after. "no we don't want to make your job easier we want to make your job redundant".

[–] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I actually think the single most useful AI task is translating into corporate speak. You can say "Write an email telling Janet to go fuck herself but politely."

And it'll be like "Good Afternoon Janet, I hope you are doing well today..." bla bla.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Janet: Summarize this email to the core of what LittleFella is trying to tell me.

AI: go fuck yourself

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

this reminds me of when AWS was the hot new thing and people did not understand you have to define a spending limit. how did people fuck this up AGAIN?

[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they only care about optimizing costs when it comes to paying workers

Because its not about the costs. It's about making sure workers stay desperate and destitute. So they can't organize.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The code formatting is difficult to read on mobile when the lines run long.

[–] Ildsaye@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Not ideal on desktop either

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 39 points 3 days ago

wow turns out if you're over leveraged on strategic costs, the vendor will notice

[–] fox@hexbear.net 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't think it's possible to spend that much on tokens doing mundane work, which means they probably had a bunch of fucking openclaw and agentic bullshit going on churning tokens on the most expensive models 24/7.

[–] homhom9000@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

I've seen demos where an AI bot takes a request and created a prd for another Ai bot to implement then another Ai bot verifies the implementation plan then anothe bot actually does the plan and another does qa and another does security and they all talk together refactoring each other.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I really don't know how google can afford what seems to be running chatgpt on every single search being done

Im gonna be real ive been searching all kinds of nonsense with the small but of joy knowing it's very expensive for them and i'm making them absolutely no money

[–] gayspacemarxist@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Google I get, they run the models on their own hardware. DDG makes no sense to me tho

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That still costs money though so it's like why does google let me turn their search bot into a horny roleplay with a few simple "pretend you're doing this" commands while other companies charge a shitload for stuff like that and still lose money? to be clear i'm only doing the horny roleplay to lose google money, don't get the wrong idea, pervert

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SmokinStalin@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hoping that thid was the hexbear here that was asking how best to sabotage their companies adoption of ai.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›