this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
73 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

85075 readers
3852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 5 minutes ago

Karl Quackenbush

Is Valve's lawyer a cartoon duck? That sounds like the name of a cartoon duck.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 1 points 16 minutes ago

I’m not happy that I know the thumbnail is a pic from Subverse.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 29 points 2 hours ago

Maybe Quackenbush's approach could've saved Valve some headaches along the way.

Oh so their suggestion is that Valve should have bowed to conservative censorship even earlier? What a waste of an article

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 7 points 1 hour ago

Visa and Mastercard, suck it! You do NOT get to decide how I spend MY money. Got it?

[–] HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 hour ago

"I don't want a lawyer to tell me what I cannot do. I hire him to tell me how to do what I want to do." — J.P. Morgan

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I imagine gaben hiring a lawyer to be creative and clever to outsmart the puritan censorship control of valve and steam. Then the lawyer taking time to think about it, giving up, and coming at gaben with that as legal advice, resulting in gaben being furious that the lawyer failed and passed that failure as default to what the opposition is trying to strongarm you to do as official advice.

Mastercard+visa: suck my cock and lick my over-ripe anus

Gaben: hey fuck you

Gaben: hires lawyer to try to not have to do that

Gaben: lawyer, I'm not doing that. What are my options?

Lawyer: huh, i am a potato and therefore have no real thought. i hereby legally suggest you suck their cock and lick their over-ripe anus. That'll be $3,000,000. Thanks.

Gaben: what the fuck do i pay you for if that's your opinion?

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 60 points 4 hours ago

Gabe Newell cursing at a lawyer is exactly what I needed to read to start the day. What a wonderful human! 🥰

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 43 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 29 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Wasn't there an issue with credit card processors threatening them?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Valve could probably just start their own bank at this point.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 11 points 2 hours ago

Steam Bank? Steam Vault? Oh Steam Treasury! Steam Financial Alliance, i would immediately dump the parasites i have now.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

I always figured they could just charge the card for a "gift card" for that amount... Which then immediately gets used for the "adult themed" game. Or at least allow the games to be sold on the store only with gift cards.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That does sound like a payment processor!

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Financial censorship is a useful tool for people who want stuff censored.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's their most effective tool at this point.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

I'd say it's their most effective direct tool.

But if you count indirect tools, I think the propaganda out there is more effective. There are school districts where somebody on the school board encountered a bit of propaganda, and then before you know it, the school district is choosing on its own to censor their own libraries of things like LGBTQ+ materials.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

No can do. Governments will ask them for age verification. Valve will instead swiftly remove anything with kinky dialogue and move on. True story by the way. Happened in Germany and no, it had nothing to do with protecting customers on Steam's side because the age verification process authorities asked for protects your identity. Valve simply didn't want to deal with it. To be fair it was a bullshit demand anyway but Sony didn't seem to have any problems implementing it so this is a Valve thing.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The article is literally just the title?

[–] morto@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago

At least it wasn't a deceptive or clickbait title. Let's give it some credit

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

I don't know what you read, if it was actually truncated for you, but there is an entire article. It's just that the article's actual content is "Did you know Steam has porn? Here's a few porn-related Steam anecdotes." The part specifically mentioned in the title, though, is just like you said, it has no more information than is in the title.

I think they are saying that more information on that topic is in the linked non-free Bloomberg article.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Newell ripped into general counsel Karl Quackenbush when the lawyer advocated for more hands-on moderation on Steam. "What the f--- do I pay you for if that’s your opinion?" Newell reportedly interjected.

Presumably he pays the legal professional for their legal opinion. Doesn't mean he has to listen, but usually you should listen to your lawyers.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 47 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

True but there's very liitle context here. It could have made more sense in the conversation if it was meant like "I pay you to fight for our position, not roll over to threats."

[–] ahornsirup@feddit.org 23 points 3 hours ago

If a position is legally untenable it's a lawyer's job to say so, though. We really don't have enough context here.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes a lawyer has nothing to fight with. The law and constitution are sometimes clear and any judge will disbar a lawyer who tries to waste the courts time on this issue (this never happens because lawyers won't risk it when things are that obvious - and usually it isn't). If you don't like it pay a lobbiest not a lawyer.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The law and constitution are sometimes clear and any judge will disbar a lawyer who tries to waste the courts time on this issue

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/023/021/e02e5ffb5f980cd8262cf7f0ae00a4a9_press-x-to-doubt-memes-memesuper-la-noire-doubt-meme_419-238.png

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 4 points 3 hours ago

I've heard about this once in my lifetime, and it made the news because it was so usual...

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They basically have to improve their filtration on pornography content. That’s my guess.