this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
748 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21645 readers
2079 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Department of Public Works employee Eric Batman claims that having to see a Progress Pride flag flying outside the department’s Alhambra, California, headquarters during the month of June effectively forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin” in conflict with his sincerely held Christian religious beliefs, according to a lawsuit filed in March by anti-LGBTQ+ evangelical nonprofit the Liberty Counsel.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 minutes ago

Fascist sues because he's reminded daily that he could be a nice and caring person if he wanted to

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... The United States of America

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 57 minutes ago

This is literally what qualifies as "shoving it down our throats" when conservatives say that LGBT+ folks can live how they want but not shove it down everybody's throats. That's my personal experience with conservative relatives and locals, at least.

Being reminded that certain "other" people exist without being hunted down is all it takes to set them off.

So while the lawsuit is a stupid waste of resources, the basic dickhead at the center of it is probably genuinely motivated to pursue it.

[–] RepublicansAreEvil@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

I saw another video today of some hag saying "who you have sex with is no one's business" but the flag is about equal representation and how gay marriage was illegal and they were denied rights. It used to be way worse than just being denied rights too-- it used to be dangerous to be out.

These people just can't face the fact that we do come from a darker world and the wounds are still fresh. They just can't think critically and inwardly it seems to hurt them. You don't have to feel shame but anyone can recognize this is exercising a right they had been denied for a long, long time

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 13 points 2 hours ago
[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Sounds like a right snowflake

[–] borQue@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

forcing to see is different. (Clockwork Orange) You can look the other way, teutonic twat.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 2 hours ago

So can all his coworkers sue them because they have to look at this bigoted piece of shit every day?

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 17 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Has he considered reading the Bible and following the teachings of Jesus Christ? It might help him understand what Christianity is supposed to be about.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 31 minutes ago

Most self-described Christians are Devil worshipers. If your religion preaches hate, you're not worshiping God, you're worshiping Satan.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do you really think they are reading their book?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Also which one? They'll pick the one that most fits what they want.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If they are reading anything but the new testament then it is just a history lesson.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago

Which translation, which interpretation? It's hard to say the New Testament is a single work with just one commonly understood message.

[–] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

But Jesus it too woke and gay for Reighwing Christians

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I want to sue Eric Batman's parents, or whoever the fuck decided on that dogshit name.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 4 points 1 hour ago

Hate to break it to you, but they got killed by a mugger.

[–] GoalPostGhost@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Would be fun to see this lawsuit succeeding.

The Satanic Temple would have a field day suing everything christian by this precedent.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago

A satanist could even argue it causes them physical harm to be subjected to "holy" imagery against their will, if the scriptures are to be believed.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm suing my employer because it rained today and I saw a rainbow.

disgusting.

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 hours ago

A few of my muslim students said that they couldn't draw a rainbow in art class, "because in our religion this is a bad thing".

I asked them "but are not all of nature's wonders the work of Allah?" While I watched the gears rolling behind their eyes I told them to ask their imams "who makes the rainbows in the sky?". And that they may return their given assignments after having received the answer.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 20 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I know I'm probably bucking the hive mind here, but I would actually support legislation that government owned building can fly only city, state, and country flags. I'm completely in on making sure that government policies are inclusive and protective of those needing them, but flags just seem performative. In fact, they could be counter productive; flying them "in support" while policies do not.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Which cities, states and countries can a building fly? Only their own? Could a federal building raise a flag for another nation in solidarity, even if support for said nation is polarizing? Flags are performative, but knowing what is allowed to be performed can be a good indicator for marginalized groups to know where they might be okay living, even if policies are quite there yet.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

In my world, no. A government building flys the flags associated with it. While it's easy to be on the side of a federal building flying the flag of Ukraine, or one state flying the flag of another going through a tragic event, supporting that would also allow government buildings to fly the Israeli flag, or the confederate flag or a MAGA flag. You don't think that confederate sympathizers in the south would claim to be marginalized and the confederate flag flying at the Mississippi statehouse would make them feel welcome? It's a knife that cuts both ways.

I want marginalized people to feel welcome in their communities, but I don't believe the flagpole of a government building is where to do it. The floor of the government building is.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Agreed. Plus a legal precedent in favor of pride flags, could cut the other way. On principle, I don't want to see hateful sentiment yield a legal victory. In practice, disallowing this kind of expression in government facilities would/should keep MAGA flags and other nonsense far from the same flagpoles. Or at the very least, it could be argued so in a second court case.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. I generally don't have an objection to pride flags but I could definitely see somebody stretching the same arguments to have a Confederate or MAGA flag (or just Trump's face as he's so fond of putting it on fucking everything)

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I come to Lemmus for exchanges like this. Well reasoned, level headed, and consequences considered. Imagine if we could get conversations like this to take place in those government buildings- sure would be swell.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Thank you. Be the change you want to see in the world, right?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 29 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like he is very, VERY gay.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That has to be it, right?

If seeing a piece of cloth is so triggering, then maybe that's an indicator of a much more deep-rooted problem.

The "Christian men" who protest gay rights the loudest are usually the ones who wind up in the headlines when they get caught soliciting male prostitutes at rest areas.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago

Fucking snowflakes

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

Eric Batman

I'M NOT GAY.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 31 points 10 hours ago

Everyone has so many theories about this guy’s motivations. I think it’s just capitalism manifest. This guy sees a way to make a buck litigating. Welcome to America.

load more comments
view more: next ›