When a primordial black hole and a star like and love each other very very much... 💋
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)
Space
2478 readers
95 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yay, brand new interstellar bypass, aww!
Soooo cute!!
Don't primordial black holes evaporate to Hawking radiation before stars could exist?
Only the smallest ones.
I believe there's an exponential relationship between size and rate of decay. So tiny black holes evaporate almost instantly, whereas anything as massive as a planet (still small for a black hole) would outlast all stars.
PBH with mass <10^6g would have evaporated before the universe had cooled enough for atoms to form. Its possible they didn't fully evaporate, but instead became "Plank relics", which are a dark matter candidate.
PBH with mass 10^7g to 10^16g would have evaporated already, producing a background of gamma rays and gravity waves that we don't see.
PBH with mass 10^17g to 10^22g would still exist today, and the gravity waves they generate are too small to be detected by current detectors. These are also a dark matter candidate.
PBH with mass >10^23, in sufficient numbers to explain the existence of dark matter, would cause gravity lensing that we don't observe.
So according to observations, if the early universe produced PBH, they didn't have an even distribution of masses from giant to tiny. Either they were all tiny (<1 ton), or they were all medium size (asteroid mass).
My favorite explanation of dark matter is the formation of asteroid mass PBHs when the early universe went through the phase change that separated the electroweak force into the electromagnetic force & nuclear weak force. Just a bit before electroweak symmetry breaking, the universe was in a state of supercooled false vacuum, and then bubbles of today's vacuum energy started expanding. The pockets of false vacuum between the expanding bubbles of true vacuum would be slower to inflate, causing their density to grow relative to the rest of the universe, until they collapse into PBH. Because they're all formed at the same time, from similar size pockets of similar density plasma, the resulting population of PBH are uniformly asteroid mass rather than having a Gaussian mass distribution.
Further reading:
Gaussian Planck Relics are Ruled-Out as Dark Matter by LIGO
Constraints on primordial black holes from the Galactic gamma-ray background