this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
52 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

85208 readers
3983 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Isn't this how taxes work?

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Profits will be negative for years so they are asking us to fund their failures

[–] db2@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

And if you believe that you'll believe anything.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 78 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"share profit with the Executive Branch and losses with the public"

ftfy

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

SpaceX IPO that is being "fast tracked" for inclusion in the S&P500 is exit liquidity for the early investors and musk. Value yourself at some bullshit and force the public to buy your shares by inclusion in the most popular index fund who are required to weight their holdings based on market cap of your stock and buy shares to mirror index.if the company were so valuable and amazing with future growth prospects why would any insiders who already have pre-IPO shares want to sell? To cash out and/or de-risk is the only answer, and the general public's retirement will fund it. It's the same reason Trump is pushing the FTC to allow riskier assets like crypto and private investments in 401k accounts; exit liquidity for the current holders, most of whom know their investments are shit. Who better to buy them than index funds and the general public by limited choice in 401k fund options?

If any of this sounds familiar, it's the same playbook as the great recession/"financial crisis", when the rich elite suddenly required rescuing and backing of the US gov because their greed didn't offer an out. Suddenly the public's problem when they would have to take a loss.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's no longer being fast tracked.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Thanks, traveling and hadn't seen the s&p update. Looks like NASDAQ's fast track is still on.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What profits? As far as I know, most or all AI are still massively unprofitable...

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Probably sharing only the negative profits, so, uh, more taxes, everybody!

[–] karashta@piefed.social 42 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wouldn't they have to make profits first?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago

You see, this way they get to share the losses with the public too!

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 8 points 15 hours ago

I've a feeling they want to share the debt with the public.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Tax them and every company that lays people off because of AI and put that towards UBI. Trumps not gonna do it because he’s a shortsighted moron, but that needs to happen if companies are planning to sacrifice jobs for AI.

[–] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

But their profits are negative… oh no.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 16 hours ago

Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.

  • Benito Mussolini
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 24 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

When you accidentally reinvent corporate taxes.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It‘s just the good old „privatize profits, nationalize losses“ playbook because AI companies are in fact not making money with it. They know the party is over so they‘re preparing to make it everyone else‘s problem. It‘s another grift on top of a grift, but unfortunately for everyone else they‘re trying to legitimize it.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

But you forget. The wealthy and powerful don't see us as people. When they say public they mean the trumps, epsteins, and Jared's of the world. We are labor or slaves in their eyes not the public.

[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 22 points 18 hours ago

“We’re talking about it where the American people can benefit from the success of AI. And by doing that, they’re going to like it better,”

What a fucking moron

[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

Profits, lol.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago

“Come inside, we have important business to discuss. Right this way, past the cage fighting ring and bulldozed half of the house.”

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

We'll share the profits but first you need to own the risk. Oh and we're not going to share the profits.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 11 hours ago

Trump's statement includes the weasel-word could at a crucial position:

“There’s a concept out there, there’s so much money and it’s so big that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies,” Trump told reporters en route to an unrelated event in Wisconsin. “I have spoken to all of them.”

That's salestalk and means nothing.

I also still don't understand how this is anything other than going public, buying and selling shares etc.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago

What profits? AI companies are burning through money like crazy.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

U.S President Plans White House Meeting With AI Companies Next Week On Federal Partnership To Share Profit~~s~~ Losses With The Public

Headline fixed

[–] mech@feddit.org 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When he talks about sharing profits with "The Public", he isn't thinking of people like you and me (he never is).
He's thinking about himself and his friends.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When the profits will be negative, I assure you he is talking about you.

[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, that's another angle: Now that the bubble is about to pop, let's quickly tie profitability (positive and negative) to the public purse.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Fuck politico.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

I read the article, and to me it still sounds like The Don is shilling for AI companies, encouraging the public to buy their stocks - nothing more.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

When you didn't think the techbros could be less trust-able...and orange turdbag somehow comes up with a way. Maybe this could make the crash happen.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 4 points 16 hours ago

"trust-able"...?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I guess he wants to show the tRump pool/skyscrapers comparison again.