this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
706 points (98.8% liked)

Comic Strips

24280 readers
1116 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tom Fishburne | marketoonist.com

Transcript

  1. A man sitting at his computer tells a woman A.I. TURNS THIS SINGLE BULLET POINT INTO A LONG EMAIL I CAN PRETEND I WROTE.

  2. A woman sitting at her computer tells a man A.I. MAKES A SINGLE BULLET POINT OUT OF THIS LONG EMAIL I CAN PRETEND I READ.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 88 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And they'll claim productivity was increased on both ends

[–] oce@jlai.lu 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of an economics joke about eating shit raising the GDP.

[–] Whimsical418@aussie.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The one chat goes something like this?

Two economists are walking through a farm. One tells the other "hey if you eat some of that shit on the ground I'll give you $100". So the second guy does it, and the first one hands over the $100. A few minutes later they pass more shit, and the second guy says to the first guy "if you eat some of that shit I'll give you $100 too", so the second guy does it and gets his $100. After a while, the first guy says "wait, did we just eat shit for nothing? No one made any money" and the second guy replied "of course not, we added $200 to the GDP!"

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Shit must be good! A million flies can't be wrong.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago

That'll be ten thousand dollars and your water supply please

cash or card?

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 weeks ago

Oh geez, early on in my current career I sent a one-paragraph project report, because it had been very little work and not complex.

My then manager loved his buzzwords and long pointless meetings, he told me my report wasn't adequate even though it had all the relevant info.

So, I just added a pile of extra bullshit that didn't say anything at all. And that fucker loved it.

I went and found another job soon afterwards.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the end bullet point is also wrong!

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's like that game were you whisper into one persons ear and they pass in on. By the end the message is completely different.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Except the telephone is just the LLM where you tell the LLM something and it regurgitates some BS.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why did I read this as "piss in it"?

Maybe that helps with understandability even... πŸ€”

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

that has literally happened for billions of years, it's called evolution

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Management loves AI because management's job is to write emails and reports, not to actually communicate meaningful information.

[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Normalise terse and succinct communication and life will be less fucking stupid. The problem does not reside in the tool but in our garbage culture of waste.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Please run the formatter so the checks pass on the PR" is a perfectly fine and polite statement. Some people act like they're being attacked.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

the problem isn't the verbose reports but the requirement of management that something needs to be done, which comes from the requirement that people earn a living wage in this economy. we need UBI

[–] morto@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The inverted compression algorithm

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Is that the in to out method?

*inverted lossy compression

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

It inflates text and the economy at the same time!

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's like file compression, but the other way round.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago

And it's not lossless.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 2 weeks ago

noisserpmoc

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The question is: the bullet point written and the bullet point read will differ.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

that's the neat part - it's completely unknowable

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Most of the time yes. But sometimes no. Only way to know for sure is to read the original point.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It all comes down to communication theory...

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Only way to know for sure is to read the original point.

well, no, you could also implement something like a checksum ...

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

A checksum requires an exact match down to the character. It can still be accurate without being a character for character match.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

The truly hilarious thing in this scenario is that the bullet point he wrote and the bullet point she gets will be completely different. Their communication will be literally lost in translation.

[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So is that what they call "garbage in, garbage out"?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

And the one bullet point that comes out was not the one bullet point the original person put in!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

If a job can be done by AI it’s probably a bullshit job.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

David Graeber, rolling in his graever.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

Decoder Encoder architecture

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I predicted this 6 years ago. It's automating corpo email ceremonies. Now all we need is to turn this into a chat app for this.