this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
98 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30062 readers
2624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 50 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Gottheimer urged Platner to step aside and allow another Democratic candidate to take on Collins. “I don’t understand how somebody like this is going to represent our party and I think the best action would be for him to leave and get somebody else who’s qualified onto the ballot.”

Josh Gottheimer supports the Iran war and co-sponsored a bill defining criticism of Israel as an offense against Jewish people. It's not Platner who we need to worry about tainting the party's brand.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

sigh Fine.

It's not Platner who we need to worry about perineuming the party's brand.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Grundle, taint, gooch, chode.... Pick your poison.

Although, I did learn the other year that many people think of a chode as a short fat dick, and I had heard that is was often on gender lines where more women have that definition. Anecdotally, of the ~10 people I surveyed, it heald mostly true, which was kind of wild but not at all binding.

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In my experience it's regional. Back home, a chode was a gooch. I moved, and all of a sudden a chode is a tuna-can dick.

It's like how a reach-around meant a completely different thing where I'm from.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought a gooch was a fuppa

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

this is the sophisticated level of discourse that drew me to the fediverse. thank you internet strangers.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

But what about the speds?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 5 days ago

Oh yeah, because switching candidates mid-stream worked out so well the last time.

We've got a candidate with a D next to his name who is actually WINNING, and all the leadership can think about is how to stop him. They should be making all their other candidates say the same things.

This why Dems have such a low approval rating among their own members.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

AIPAC about to lose its shit and dump another $4 million into this race

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

The DNC will sabotage him. Make no mistake, the party would rather he lose.

Keeping their death grip on the party is their driving force, not beating republicans.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Small change. They spend as much as they have to.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago

And fuck the Corporate Establishment Dems who keep trying to suppress progressives like Mamdani and Platner. Clearly the electorate has different plans, but they'd rather have MAGA in charge than Progressives.

We have a war to fight with the DNC.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Well its at least going to be interesting..

How long before AIPAC gives up and picks a different battle?

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's a Senate seat. They'll pay until their check-writing hand falls off.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is right. They'll just massage their already-purchased senators to send more of our tax dollars to Israel. The money will never run out.

We give about twice as much money to Israel as we do to California. But also, California is taxed by the federal government. In fact, they're taxed more than they receive funding. Why the fuck are we giving universal healthcare and college to Israel while withholding it from ourselves? Even if y'all can excuse the genocide we're enabling (!) how can you "America first" fucks justify exporting the good life that you are working hard to earn? Where is your outrage?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

Why the fuck are we giving universal healthcare and college to Israel while withholding it from ourselves?

This. THIS! WTF? Why does the rest of world get nice stuff, but we don't, even though we PAY for it for OTHERS?

I want America to do good things for the world, but can't we make our own country a good place first?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The money will run out, likely before these traitors lose control of the federal government (because they are fixing to fix our elections and arrest the opposition,) just wait until they have a plausible crisis to justify trillions and trillions more. 8 years I bet.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Same as it always was. Republicans added trillions to the debt already, with more to come, and will then play the part of budget hawk as soon as they've lost power and dumped it on the Democrats. They've done that for every administration in my lifetime. "Fiscal conservative" is as much an obvious lie as "compassionate conservative".

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I just imagine an AIPAC class action lawsuit about carpel tunnel

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 days ago

I don't think this is ever going to be a done deal enough for AIPAC to give up. Maine's still purple and they'll have their Democratic centrist turncoats to buoy the effort.

I expect Collins is going to do a lot more Israel glazing in the future.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

I'm tired of interesting. I want a boring government where nothing interesting happens.