this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
573 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11625 readers
2285 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Monopoly the game was invented to describe literally this

When y'all gonna flip the board

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

The real way to achieve trickle down economics is to keep killing the people at the top until desired wealth distribution.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 62 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

What was the figure? All it would take to end world hunger is 500 billion or something like that? Half one person's weath?

What sort of person has that amount and decides not to end world hunger.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago

Musk said he could do it with six billion.

Naturally, he didn’t even try.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 60 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The same kind of person that steals a trillion from society in the first place

[–] errer@lemmy.world 30 points 8 hours ago

The same kind of person who ends government programs that help those hungry people, killing hundreds of thousands of them

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Hunger is a political problem, not a money problem. You can't just say "here are X billion dollars, let's end world hunger". Having said that, the system that allows people like Musk to get that rich, is also the same system that creates hunger.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

Here in the good ole USA money and politics are the same thing. If you have the political will, you can get the money and if you have the money, you can but the political will.

That said, didn’t Elmo have a beef with the fucking United Nations because he said he’d pay the 6 or 7 billion to end world hunger if the could prove that it’s possible and then they produced a detailed plan and he quibbled and but-akshually’ed his way to a reneg because he never intended to do jack shit for anyone other than himself?

Probably, but if you started with 500B vs 0 I'm guessing one will have a better result.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Not defending this worthless sack of shit but I'm certain he doesn't actually have that much money

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I mean it’s all tied up in stocks and if he wanted to liquidate it, all he’d lose control over all his companies and the sudden sell off would collapse the company stocks and probably destroy the world economy.

It looks very impressive on paper though.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He can take out loans using the made up money as collateral without ever paying taxes on it.

[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Someone should dare Elon to do this.

[–] somebody2152@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They did.

in 2021

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/18/tech/elon-musk-world-hunger-wfp-donation

https://mashable.com/article/elon-musk-solve-world-hunger

except it was 1/6 of his worth (6.6b$) instead of half, and we he did nothing they left the plan public and called for wny other billionaires to do it.

And since you're hearing about it here, guess who stepped up to do it?

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Somebody?

Somebody2152 perhaps?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

What it would really take to end world hunger is massive systemic change that’s actually pretty straight-forward but is fought by every single person who loves a deaperate workforce and their insane conservative followers who believe that their greatest enemy is a hungry person.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 9 hours ago

It was $6B he offered

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

all those times when I said we should just kill him and people kept saying that it would just go to his kids or other people. well now it's way way more.

[–] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

Or the fucking millions that just lost healthcare for billionaires to have more tax breaks

[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I don't consider him a trillionaire. The stock he holds is of an unprofitable company. If he tried to hold a trillion dollars in his hands by cashing out on the stock, it would plummet, who would buy that at that price without the hype? If he cant hold a trillion dollars in his hands, how can he be a trillionaire? Its purely speculative.

It's like some ancient king claiming to be a trillionaire because a lot of people believe that there's a ton of gold in his kingdom - without good evidence. There's no guarantee he'd be able to mine enough gold to become a trillionaire, so why call him that?

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago
[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago

That's almost 1.3 million per homeless person or 55k for 18 million people to eat

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What is she referring to when she says “changed the rules?” The rules of basic human decency, or something more concrete?

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The ipo rules, they were going to ignore a bunch of rules and just go but I heard they changed their minds and will actually apply the rules so the spacex ipo shouldn't be anytime soon. Same for anthropic and openai.

Edit: I think the s&p500 specifically.

[–] somebody2152@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

I would assume it refers to lots of things, starting with this:

and then things like the corporate tax rate, capital gains, inheritance, lack of anti trust enforcement, reducing labor protections, deregulations, wide spread wage theft, regulatory capture, etc. etc.

Like , you can say 'what rules? ' and there's no one rule or set of rules that changed to enable a trillionaire, but there have been a plethora of systemic changes to favor those in power over time, and allow for more exploitation and less accountability.

That may or may not be what she's referring to, but it's how I take it.

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The difference between a billion dollars and a trillion dollars is roughly a trillion dollars...

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't know what this person is on about. "Doing nothing"? In the last year and a half several steps have been taken to make the lives of those 771k and 18mil peoples much worse.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

May the same worms eat him.

[–] cattywampus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The goal isn't to increase wellbeing, the goal is to increase power and control, that's the core issue.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think they're leaving out a whole lot of homeless, there's no way it's only 770K

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

That's the US number