this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
709 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30100 readers
2519 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill shared a startling revelation last week that Iranian negotiators had recruited psychologists to help navigate what they believed was Trump’s “impaired mental state.” And on Monday, Scahill provided an update on Iran’s unique approach to the negotiations, which he said Tehran partially credited for Sunday’s success.

“Senior Iranian psychologists began working with the negotiating team to try to cater the messages that the Iranians were sending via mediators back to Donald Trump to try to take into account what they say as his specific mental illness and mental deficiencies,” Scahill said in an interview with Democracy Now published on Monday.

“Almost quite clinically, they said they began to see this process yielding results as they worked with psychologists to send these communications to Donald Trump, and they credit that, in part, with getting to this point where Trump finally accepted some version of his manufactured and almost entirely false victory narrative.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

He’s a textbook malignant narcissist so that’s pretty easy to manipulate

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Did they give him the FIFA Bigly Deal Maker Prize?

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

He's the UFC (Ultimate Failure Champion).

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think this is unique, it's just rare for someone to openly say it.

Especially since openly saying it runs the rather high risk of undermining the whole approach. If Trump hears this, he'll get all pissy and tank things for the sake of his fragile ego.

You can see it in most every person in Trump's circle. They all play the game of manipulating the president, all you need to do is risk your dignity and you can pretty much get him to do whatever. If they dare to serve their own ego, they fail.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

He's already tanked it several times thus far. That's why he keeps saying they're leaking false conditions. Like no grampa, you just weren't told about those.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the con is longer than just this deal. Or maybe this is coming from someone other than Iran that wants the war to heat up rather than end (or even just to keep the strait closed).

Or maybe someone's head got too big and they wanted to brag about manipulating Trump when it wasn't yet strategically or tactically sound to do so.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Colud be someone bragging to someone not expecting it to work all the way out to the media.

Or a narrative that is probably fairly described, but editorialized. E.g. if they did state the fact they had the help of psychologists in negotiating, that statement by itself doesn't necessarily insult a man that thinks only very smart people pass cognitive tests.

So the reporting actually extrapolates into the obvious, but unstated implications of why pyschologists would be useful in this situation.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

all you need to do is risk your dignity

How quaint of you to think those psychos have a shred of dignity

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Well that's what they're saying.. they don't have any dignity, that's why they can get him to do all this stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people know how to play Trump, give him some meaningless reward, a golden plane whatever. "best president the world has ever seen"

Tell him last time he said this even though he didn't etc. like old people scammers.

Experts are not even needed.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The world needs to crowdfund a gold plated private jet and a "This person did not appear in the Epstein files" award to Trump, then tell him to send the military after the oligarchs and the theocratic fascists.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

It could all be much simpler than we think. Half a million people on earth spend 1000 bucks each and it's all over.

A few million to say JD Vance is "crooked" on TV A few million to deport Elon or Peter Thiel

Etc.

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 21 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This deal isn't worth the paper it hasn't been printed on.....

But Iranians aren't stupid, they know this too, and they won't be caught with their pants down. They were ready 4 months ago, and they'll be ready next time

[–] manchicken@infosec.pub 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's almost like they've been preparing for this for nearly 60 years or something. People are clever, and every time a major power decides to go to war they show the whole world what they're capable of, which isn't a good thing for someone like Trump. Man's all bluff and no follow-through.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

They've been preparing ever since Bolton was trying to force this war back in 2018/2019.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Yet now they've let it get in the press that they see him as mentally ill. Trump's ego will not like that despite how true it is.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

His nurses will keep it from him. If he doesn't see a fake version of the internet yet, he will be after this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy 9 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

He's clearly losing it, but this is also clearly propaganda from a country engaged in a war. Anyone who takes this seriously is a fool. Trump is a vacant turnip, but we can asses that for ourselves. Don't be stupid. Of course they will say anything they can to smear him. They don't need to. He's already covered in shit.

Let's hope his derangement leads to a direct attack on israel when they refuse to honor whatever peace deal we make to pretend we weren't pantsed by Iran.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 24 points 16 hours ago

Using psychology to understand how to come to terms with a narcissistic shit baby doesn't seem that implausible to me.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Just because it's propaganda doesn't mean it's untrue. The story tracks and changes nothing I believe about the US's tyrannical tangerine toddler.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The next question: so why are they saying this? It seems to me that Iran values weakening the US more than they do a peace deal, even a lopsided $300B one. So Trump has a temper tantrum and goes back to bombing Iran. Through some twisted logic, that's good for Iran.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Unironically, the people leaking this want the war. Could be Iranian hardliners, could be made up whole cloth. Hell, could be mossad agents that have infiltrated the Iranian government, hoping to reignite the war for Israel. I have no doubt that this was written to reignite the war; we'll just have to see what comes out of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 164 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago

I think he'd believe it if we told him his golden bunker moon base was completed and ready for him. Then we could just send him out there somewhere.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 249 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They took advantage of a mentally disabled octogenarian?! /s

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They escaped an abusive relationship

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, no, America. They escaped a nasty fence dispute with a deranged neighbor.

You're the one still stuck in the abusive relationship, unfortunately.

Lots of love from the north. Good luck.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Huh? The statement was that they escaped, not that they're stuck in it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They should have kept going. Like, get his banking info or something. Him getting scammed would just be chef’s kiss.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They are getting 300 billions out of this. Not from his own account, but still.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

As they should have. All's fair in love and war. No '/s' needed.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Iran, if you're reading this, can we uhh, hire your psychologists? Asking on behalf of most Americans.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

You don't need them. Manipulating a narcissist is incredibly easy, like take candy from a baby easy.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 161 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I don't doubt this for even a second.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Are they refering to praying on his narcissism or his dementia??

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Probably both.a combination of "don't you remember when we agreed to this?" And "only a big strong president with large hands could make this deal, what a big boy you are."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

Evidently Israel asked for a copy of the deal and Washington told them "no". I was cracking up.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The great thing is that they can publish this and it won't change a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago

"We are giving you the Iranian world peace prize and the golden key the the straight of Hormuz"....thx for the billions

load more comments
view more: next ›