this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
358 points (97.1% liked)

Linux

65863 readers
465 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/hardware/p/2144337/commodore-announces-linux-based-flip-phone-with-no-social-media-no-browser-the-callback

Linux-based phone still ‘runs 99% of Android apps’ so you can do more with it, if you wish.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They lost me at $499. A phone that is just a phone should be about a hundred bucks max. I didn't read the article though. Maybe it's still very computery.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Small production run + half-decent internals probably accounts for a lot of the price.

Having experimented with $100 underpowered flip phone on KaiOS, lack of apps was a real problem. What (some) people want is the slight inconvenience of a T9 keyboard and an annoyingly small screen to help them limit their screen time, but they still want full functionality of all their apps.

[–] coltn@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

as someone who has been using t9 phones for the last 3-4 years, the tough part is will the software and keys even be good on this. you just don't know till you use it. It's true, having an underpowered phone sucks ( I'm using the Sonim X320 now which I believe has 4GB of ram, and it's soooo nice compared to the Cat S22 Flip ). But a lot of issues on my previous phones (prev mentioned Cat, then the Qin F25) was mostly the software not working well with buttons or the screen size. The sonim I have now works well because the stock apps a designed for the hard ware. $450 or whatever is still too much, but if it covers all the bands and use usable, at least it's an option.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know some people who would actually kill for a physical T9 keyboard so they could touch-type. It's not my cup of tea, but I can definitely see it being a major draw for people who grew up texting on a real flip phone.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I thought it woud suck, but with the touch typing + consistent dictionary guessing, it's really on par with the random chaos of a touchscreen keyboard.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Just found out about the Twiddler 4--a single-handheld bluetooth keyboard. too damn expensive at over $200, but something I'd definitely try otherwise.

[–] yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk 18 points 2 days ago

$499? No thanks

[–] droniecarp@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

Zero justification for that price tag.

[–] Geodes_n_Gems@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

That's a stupid price, one of the main things of brick/flip phones is their low price, HMD feature phones range from about £20 to £70, some new google pixels can go for about this price, so getting something with the price of a smartphone with a fraction of the features sounds scummy.

[–] Wrongdoer2@sh.itjust.works 114 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Great initiative but at this price it's just a scam srlsy..

[–] ultimate_worrier@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 3 days ago (6 children)

My sentiments exactly. They’re charging $499 for $5-100 worth of hardware.

This is the “snakes on a plane” of phones.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Look, I love the idea of a Linux phone.

But $500 and it manages my temptations for me? Fuck no.

The whole point of Linux is freedom.

Enough behavior shaping.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who is going to pay $500 for a retro flip phone, when you can get a second-hand iPhone for half that? Or you know, an actual flip phone for $25.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GMac@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Whatsapp preinstalled... hard pass from me. All the other considerations like price, browser block, app emulation implementation; those are all things I could probably get past but preinstalled spyware is unacceptable from the get go.

Edit to add. The app blocking is interesting to me. Instead of thinking about the user being blocked from unstalling and using the app, I'm curious about the technology they will use to block the app (and app maker) from running activity on the device.

Hopefully the solution includes something like DNS blocking rather than a blacklist on the play integrity api and a reliance on Google killing the unstall of apk from other sources.

Not sure if DNS blocking explains the browser exclusion which is otherwise a bit odd.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

This phone is probably aimed at countries where Whatsapp is legit mandatory if you want a social life and a job (e.g. much of Europe and South America)

[–] dawcas@scribe.disroot.org 6 points 2 days ago

I'm from Spain and don't have Watsapp nor a smartphone. Coincidentally I also lack a social life.

Brazil uses WhatsApp for everything, including doctor appointments, filling prescriptions, banking, take out orders... I mean, really everything...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 66 points 3 days ago (3 children)

MediaTek Helio G81 SoC, with 4GB/64GB

Uhhh. For $500? Sorry, no.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 61 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I mean its a small company. We have become too used to subsidized costs at the sake of our privacy. Know why TVs are now $200? They are literal spyware in the home. Try buying one without spyware, $999 real fast for the same TV.

Know why phone companies give you a "free" $1000 phone? Youre the product. Constantly tracked and sold. A digital slave.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Pinephone was a fraction of that price. Can't you run PostmarketOS on a Fair phone too? But that has much better specs.

[–] OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The pinephone was atrocious (As a daily) though. From what I’ve heard from owners it still struggles to this day to run basic mobile Linux OSes.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Fact. It's amazing that it exists, but it is definitely not a daily driver device. At least for me.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Phone companies dont give you a "free" $1000 phone, you're actually paying more for it via the monthly bill payments.

That's on top of you being the product as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Browser and email is the bare minimum, though.

Even the cheapest clamshells in the 2000s had those two.

Don't preinstall it by default if you want to look minimal but being forced to sideload (their app store blocks this essential category?????) an Android APK in the emulator instead of using native Linux apps for that, is ridiculous

I understand that for a small company like them (it's being owned by a YouTuber now) creating hardware is extremely expensive and 499 can even considered cheap with all the custom stuff in this device, plastic molds, dedicated assembly lines and so on, but my mind can't accept paying more than 149 for something like this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At $200... Maybe.

AI slop video, no faith in what will (or likely won't) be delivered.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

500$? and they used to make one of the cheapest computers on the market

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago

no social media, no browser
marketing material: social media in a glorified browser

[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

It's like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We'll get some news articles about how it's trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It'll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

It's a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they're ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 40 points 3 days ago (4 children)

How does it not have social media or browser if so many apps are compatible? Doesn’t that amount of compatibility mean we can still have social media and browsers?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Based on the article, they have a blocklist of certain apps. You can only install apps they allow. Not sure how extensive the list is, but surely the most popular ones are blocked and they will probably update the list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

Ah yes, another company trying to squeeze ridiculous amounts of money out of people just because "it has linux".

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

WhatsApp isn't a social media app?

[–] daeraxa@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wouldn't really class it as such, its just fancy texting for the majority of users

[–] bier@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah I use it for that, I don't use channels or stories etc. Would be nice if I could convince more people to signal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gblues@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Well, looks like someone made a Jack Tramiel based LLM and let it hallucinate.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

The price is unfeasible lmao. You could get an old phone for like 50$ used, put lineage on it, don't install any app or store and be done with it

[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While it seems like everyone here hates it, I’ve been looking for a minimal phone for when my current one dies. This seems to hit the exact sweet spot of functionality I want vs what I don’t want. As for the price, well, I’m spending at least that much on my next phone anyway so it seems fine by me.

And I have a huge nostalgia for flip phones and transparent electronics. So yeah, signed up to preorder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Sounds great for kids. The price point can suck a dick tho

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I get the idea of dumb phones, but $500 (or with taxes in Europe at least 600 EUR) for a phone that cannot even run a browser? This is ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

499? hahahhaa

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

My first thought was, this might be about just what's installed by default. Reading a bit further the article says:

Apparently, the OS has hard blocks to stop the installation of browsers and social media apps.

"Users are still able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files..."

So I'm not sure why I would want pay 500 Dollars / Euros, just so they have control over what I can install and not. To me this would be a deal breaker. Also this seems to be "basically a custom version of the Jolla Sailfish OS", so there are probably "better" options using the same OS. And it only has 4GB of RAM? I am not impressed for the price and for the control.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Commodore? C64 and Amiga Commodore? Well, it seems to be a new startup that simply bought and revived the trademark. Instead of a $500 paperweight, they should instead focus on affordable, Linux-based PCs and laptop. Perhaps they could build their own distro using an Amiga-esque filesystem. I would definitely daily-drive a Commodore-branded laptop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

load more comments
view more: next ›