this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
113 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

85567 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think in five years — if the tools manage to stick around — finding coders that can work without AI assistance will be like finding skilled assembler developers.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 1 hour ago

Sweet. I'm set for life, and I'll get to be one of those devs that tells the bosses what I've decided to work on.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Ha, jokes on you. I never had the skills to ruin. Now I can make my messes bigger.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 22 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's a good thing AI doesn't rely on competent people for training its input and double-checking its output, because otherwise this would be very bad news.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 26 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Hell, even before AI there were signs. Half the mechanics in our shop can't diagnose shit unless there's an error code shown when they plug in the computer.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I can't figure out what's wrong. Every time I print a document, it says it prints, but I just get out a piece of white paper. It was getting lighter and lighter and lighter, and now it's just gone entirely.

Lol

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, no, see if you demonstrate any capacity for troubleshooting printers you fail the intelligence test.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

As an IT guy, I can confirm, it's a trap.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's No Child Left Behind from Lil Bush...

They just stopped teaching critical thinking and empathy decades ago. People in their 30s and under were never taught critical thinking.

Even with video games, they grew up where a 5 second pause meant googling a walkthrough video. The Water Temple would have broken them.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Can confirm, water temple broke me

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The intro of Idiocracy on overdrive. Well done.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

And ever since I got a forklift my arm strength has gone down.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You use a forklift to do things you physically can't do. This is a bad analogy. Even if you never used a forklift at all you'd still likely not have the muscle capacity to lift 500+ lbs pallets all day. You certainly couldn't just lift a tonne.

And you wouldn't use a forklift to increase your muscle tone, or build muscle.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I physically can't refactor a codebase in 15 minutes.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

The only codebase an agentic system could refactor in 15 minutes would be almost trivially small. I still couldn’t do it in 15 mins, but give me a couple hours and I’ll make much more meaningful improvements

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're missing the forest for the trees here because the point is, you're capable of doing the task, just not doing it in the same amount of time as a computer.

You chose a poor analogy to explain your POV. I'm pointing out the flaw in it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And I could manually relocate all the contents of a palette, too. Just not anywhere near as quickly and easily as I can with a forklift. The analogy is still apt.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. Look at it the other way. The person who can lift the heavy thing may not be able to continue to lift the heavy thing if they use the forklift all the time and don't ever train their muscles. Which is what the article is pointing out. Doing the task by hand re-enforces knowledge and skill. Over-reliance on a tool is a well known phenomenon.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And yet the person with the forklift is moving more stuff than the guy who did it by hand could manage. The "over" in "over-reliance" is a subjective value judgment and I just don't agree.

I'm not seeing the problem here. Technology is developed specifically for this purpose, to remove unnecessary burden from humans and enhance their capabilities. There's nothing noble about laboring unnecessarily hard to accomplish goals in a suboptimal manner. I could write programs in assembly language but instead I use high-level languages and compilers. Does that result in over-reliance on compilers?

John Henry died in the process of "beating" the steam hammer and then got replaced anyway. Nowadays it'd be considered foolish to do that work by hand.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, there are definitely a lot of trades where things are still taught by hand in the event that you have to do them by hand some day. Doing it by hand does more than just re-enforce knowledge. It also teaches you new things and allows a process, and the space to re-evaluate and innovate. We improve by doing those things by hand. That is very often worth the cost. You very often don't get things quickly, cheaply, and with quality. The AI will degrade if we don't provide it with quality information to work with. It is nothing without our skills. We won't have those skills if we don't use them.

You talk like a businessman rather than an artisan or a creator of things, so perhaps your mindset is different but what happens when the AI breaks something and nobody can fix it because they lack the ability to think about the problem constructively or understand what the problem actually is.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 2 hours ago

As I said, I can write programs in assembly language. I have actually done so, small trivial ones. I'm not a businessman, I'm a programmer. But I use compilers basically all the time because it would be ridiculous not to.

If an AI is able to break something in a way that no human can fix then I suppose that's a sign that AI has exceeded human capabilities. Do you think it's there yet?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Are we going to pay to go to a mental gymnasium where we complete coding and critical reasoning tasks manually to stave off the atrophy?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

I mean, people already do this. Lots of folks do crosswords or sudoku or other puzzles to keep their mind sharp. It's pretty commonly recommended by doctors I think.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Hah. Leetcode becomes more popular among the employed. Software developers have AI agents run some big tasks while they get some Leetcode time in. Lol