this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
154 points (100.0% liked)

pics

28840 readers
734 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mwknight@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

There is a strong chance that one of those is the lost 4th X-wing that disappeared in 1977 then turned up in Greg Jein's private collection after he passed in 2023.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/oct/16/star-wars-x-wing-model-auction-rare-prop-found-sold-record-breaking-heritage-auctions

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn’t realize they shot multiple models at once. I had assumed they had one model that they shot multiple times and composited together. I suppose you save time this way, at the cost of making the shot a little trickier to make sure the support of the front X-Wing doesn’t obscure the ones behind it.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Back then it was probably a lot easier to make more models, and the quality would be better with a single shot. Some of the original footage has blocky areas where the merging wasn't perfect. Didn't matter back then, it was far better than most anything else, but three model shots plus a background would have been ugly. Original Star Trek footage also has some of that.

Or to put it another way, we couldn't have faked the Moon footage because the technology to fake it wasn't created yet. It was easier to just build a big rocket and go.

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Well, the government hired Stanley Kubrik to fake the moon landing. Problem is, he was such a damn perfectionist that he demanded that they shoot on location.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I wonder if it has to do with ease of compositing multiple models. If you have three X-Wing models in the same shot you can have one in focus, with the others a little blurry and if the front one passes in front of the others perhaps it makes the compositing easier since instead of cutting two models separately and trying to make them look correct as they pass in front of the camera, you just cut them out together.