this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
734 points (99.3% liked)

News

38095 readers
1813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 22 hours ago

Every time SCOTUS does this shit, they get one step closer to impeachments, and an expansion of the court.

I used to believe we should expand it to 13 seats, but I no longer hold that belief. Now I believe that we should expand it to 29 seats. SCOTUS is too important, it shouldn't be so small that one bad-faith president can manipulate the composition of the court so that he negatively impacts policy for the next 50 years.

29 justices, rolling term limits, so every Prez gets to appoint a few, but never enough to alter the steady progression of our society and history, with wild cultural and political swings.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 4 points 21 hours ago

If you can't even challenge the legality of your detention, then you don't live in a law-abiding nation. That leaves only one way to challenge the state and I guarantee they're not going to like it.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago

The constitution is quite clear on this...

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

6 of them are firmly stuck up trumps ass so you can set that question aside

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

In a 6-3 decision...

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

No justice under the Roberts court

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

The only question to ask. Have you bitch slapped a republican today and if not why not?

[–] VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t even know why they bother pretending they have laws anymore. No one on the outside buys their bullshit and their loyal zombie hordes will bend over for any reason. It’s just a silly larp now.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

The laws still exist for us, what you described is for the owner class

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We still have laws.

The laws are whatever trump wants them to be, when he wants them to be them.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

so like calvinball?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaintNectar@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

Nazi working their way around

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The answer has always been no. Whoever's asking the court for this is who we should be worried about.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

The answer is an emphatic no. This shouldn't even be a question that needs asked.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 124 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If this shit happens then none of us (citizens included) have due process. ICE can just say they suspect you're an illegal immigrant and lock you up forever. A lot of people seem to think that if you just show them the documents or prove that you're a citizen this won't happen. All they have to do is snatch you up. You typically see this line of thought from folks defending the current administration, like they believe if you rationally present your argument to authority they'll always agree.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of people seem to think that if you just show them the documents or prove that you're a citizen this won't happen.

Aren't there already cases where holding valid documents has had no effect?

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

yeah, they already deported US citizens.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 days ago

There are already enough cases of people showing their papers to ICE and discovering that ICE don't care and aren't held to account. But the people supporting it tend to be the "pay no attention until it happens to me" type.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 154 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ooooh nice, so they’re effectively going to decide if they get to actually run concentration camps in an official capacity. Delightful.

Also, I don’t expect ICEatzgruppen to abide by the court order if it doesn’t go their way

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Everything the Nazis did was legal under German law. They were meticulous about renewing the Enabling Act multiple times.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 10 points 1 day ago

Emil Bove is the person that floated the idea that they simply not abide by the courts. Seems important for later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: next ›