this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026

117 points (99.2% liked)

chat

8625 readers

220 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

LeninWeave@hexbear.net

abc@hexbear.net

117

one of the saddest examples of technology becoming obsolete is the zepplin/blimp (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/chat@hexbear.net

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just love them so much. Everytime I watch historical footage from the early 20th century I get very sad over the zepplins and blimps. I wish I could see them floating through my sky on a daily basis just doin stuff that isn't solely advertising. They are the closest we have to sky whales. I just love that they float around like that, very joyous and whimsical. Fucked up we don't make use of them anymore. I bet this makes them as sad as it makes me. Relatively low energy cost btw.

I've cried over this while drunk more than once. Think of me next time you call blimps useless technology

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ghosts@hexbear.net 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The craziest part about the Hindenberg disaster for me was that 2/3rds of the people on board survived. And I guess also that they had a smoking lounge

[–] AltMaarri@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I guess also that they had a smoking lounge

They did, an interesting one. Given the proximity of the hydrogen it had a double airlock and slight overpressure to avoid hydrogen getting in; and a steward at the exit making sure nobody took lit up cigarettes / pipes outside.

[–] billgamesh@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Very cool!

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wish I could smoke on a blimp

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

tbh if i was on a blimp i'd just take an edible

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

China uses them for logistics in Tibet a lot! They're great for short repetitive trips that moves really heavy stuff in difficult terrain

Back in the day before helicopters rich dudes put blimp mooring posts on their skyscrapers was the old timey private jet

Afaik the empire state building still has it's planned mooring post

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] AvocadoVapelung@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

born in the wrong universe to get turned to paste alongside your comrades trying to bring down invading coalition airships with nothing but revolutionary plasm

born in the right universe to get deep-sixed by a delivery drone for hanging solar panels from your balcony

kitty-cri-texas

[–] somename@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Consider, delivery blimp. Hydrogen inside to save money, a little fan powered by solar panels on it and running a basic navigation software.

It could be wonderful. The dream Amazon is hiding from you.

Until someone shoots it and it explodes.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hydrogen is only about 8% more buoyant than helium which doesn't explode. May as well use that.

[–] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Helium is quite hard to come by tho. Hydrogen is much easier to get.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] red_stapler@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They could be covered in solar panels and swoosh silently through the skies.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

I would die for this future

[–] Letztertod@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A lot of technology we consider obsolete is truly just not profitable for our overloads, look at how many people are using mp3 players again, look at how many people are listening to records again. It is important that we remember old tech so we can revive it if we want in a better world and destroy the tech we don't need like fucking crypto farms and ai data centers.

[–] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Also blimps are genuinely useful. Like how else could you float in place in the air long term? Helicopters will run out of fuel. Planes can't be motionless like that. It's just that we are very fossil fuel coded so we use helicopters for everything and shrug at the fuel use. Is it used for mass passenger movement? No. But weather balloons are kind of the same thing for example. The tech does still get used. Just not exactly as a blimp/zeppelin. Using them as motherships for drone swarms is something that's been explored recently I think.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is what they took from you

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I saw the Goodyear blimp fly directly overhead once and it was cool as shit.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah, I love that for you

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I hope that blimps make a comeback. They could be used as drone carriers (like aircraft carriers), and could recharge the drones with solar power. And if they were unmanned, then hydrogen would be more more acceptable.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus materials science has come miles since then. I'm sure you could further lower the fire risk with tougher textiles, modern ultra-light nonsparking alloys and redundant multi-chamber designs. This shit could be made to work.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

CARRIER HAS ARRIVED

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once the Children of Kali start shooting down jets, airships will start making a lot more sense

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So about hydrogen. I think many people forget that every machine we use has flammable shit in it. Like jet fuel explodes too. They were just bad at stopping things from exploding back in the day. We have oxygen tanks around hospitals all the time and they rarely explode. Gasoline is everywhere it rarely explodes. We'd just need to be more careful about the hydrogen and it would probably be fine.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] TheRedWedge@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 week ago

Kirov reporting.

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Only if you have an unlimited supply of birthday grade helium.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One day fusion power will be a reality

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, but we kinda need the water… or we probably will by then.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Haha dw about it ❤️😘

[–] Super_Lumalo@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

ok yay 💗

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[+] Spongebobsquarejuche@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

[deleted]

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blimps ARE NOT lame 😡

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hovercraft: They’re not exactly common in the U.S. but the U.K. has a bunch. You can even buy a personal one for like 30K… not exactly cheap but not unattainable.

Flying Cars: Theoretically there’s the Molor sky car with its 9 Mazda engines… but with gas prices… and the whole lack of an untethered demo, stick with the hovercraft.

Rocket Packs: Primary problem is they burn off your assmeats. There is actually a “Rocket Man” though. Ieves Rossi or something like that. IIRC he actually sells the suits. And there’s a few folks who still make the 70’s era peroxide jet packs, but you only get like 90 seconds.

Mass Transit: California is building a high speed rail line 😂 The networks will probably always be imperfect at best, but the rise of small EVs (bikes, scooters, etc.) seems poised to bridge the gap.

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a heads up to any comrades looking to get into rocket packs -- the US DOJ went after John Gotti for flying around with an unlicensed rocket pack and hunting Nazis out of season

[–] DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Going to need a link for this…

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

California is building a high speed rail line

lmao "building" doing a lot of heavy lifting here. That project has been in the works for like 18 years and has a "projected" completion year of 2030-2033 with many components of it like tunnels and coastal extensions to serve cities between San Francisco having no projected completion date and it is realistically decades away from completion (if ever). It's an absolute joke.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There was a startup like 20 years ago trying to get them to be used for trucking/shipping purposes iirc. Guess it didn't work out. If used with hydrogen instead of helium, that can be more cost effective. I've only seen the Goodyear ones a few times when some kind of sportsball event is happening in the metro.

Supposedly they are constantly getting shot at in the states. I recall seeing some docu show where one of the pilots or maintenance folks mentioned finding small holes in them quite often after flying around.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

Hopefully we see fusion power in our lifetimes and helium becomes a cheap commodity. I feel it is unlikely but every night I go to bed dreaming of this future.

Anyway that last bit is the most american thing I have heard all day lmao

[–] RedNajm@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow, i forgot blimps existed holy shit. I only saw one once in my life overseas, two decades ago and never saw it again (I live in a developing country, we don't have this stuff. It was somewhere in europe iirc?) Now that I remember it, how the hell could i forget about that? There's something so mind-boggling about it just slowly floating in the air, and a beautiful sight

Fuck everything else we need to RETVRN to fucking rad blimps

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google money is trying to bring it back :https://sfstandard.com/2025/11/18/san-francisco-blimp-lta-research/

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only it was the will of the proletariat creating blimps for the love of the game

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago

For me the saddest example is the Ekranoplan.

Just look at how cool (and kind of terrifyingly) this thing is!

[–] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

ive been inside the hanger for the goodyear blimp and its so massive it makes you feel nauseous

v cool

load more comments