this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
266 points (98.5% liked)

World News

56721 readers
1540 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"Big thing too big, politicians only think small, not big. Me not want to say what I really think".. neither do I Andy, because you'd have me kicked out of the country just like your predecessor. Same shit different asshole.

I guess the pile of dead children is probably too big for him to acknowledge now. Where do you find such morally empty sad disgusting bitch ass fucking losers?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm somewhat suspicious of the way the Guardian didn't actually publish the interview itself, but just their journalist's writeup of it. We're not told what the question he answered actually was, just what it was "about", and then the headline writers of the outlets quoting that quote take it a step further into implying that he's a full-on genocide denier.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 hours ago

Another fucking coward.

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago

Israel is doing exactly what it was made to do, why would the USA and UK betray their own creation? Especially since it's working.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

So.... It being called or not being called a genocode is the divide to where killing civilans matters? Interesting

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The UK were instrumental in giving birth to this settler-colony by issuing the Balfour declaration in 1917, taking Palestine over after World War 1, arresting and executing Palestinian nationalists during the Arab uprising in 1936, and training the Irgun and Hagana Jewish terror gangs and then promptly high tailing it out of there when the going got rough. So its no surprise that British politicians are hand in glove supporting this current genocide.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not that the 1917 Balfour declaration was well written or overly centered on justice-- "The Balfour Declaration" was merely a very short letter from a british secretary to Lord Rotheschild after all (to curry favor), not an official policy document or government statement-- but zionists pretended it was more of a policy declaration than it was. Israel immediately violated what protections the Balfour letter imagined.

Balfour specified that "nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine".

Zionists immediately launched into violating civil and religious rights in minute #1 of the Israeli states existence and theyve never stopped for a single second of that states existence. There has never been an Israel there that wasnt based on hatred, racism, and vicious oppression that massively violates civil and religious rights.

You also said the UK trained Irgun. I think you are mistaken. Irgun was primarily trained by instructors from the Polish Armed Forces in 1938 and 1939, with supplementary instruction received at the Military Engineers School in Fascist Italy. The training was facilitated through partnerships forged by Vladimir Jabotinsky’s Revisionist Zionist movement. Training Irgun was a nazi project. Irgun then became the IDF. Heres an interesting read on that: https://fpif.org/running-war/

Irgun was attacking the Brits with terrorism attacks right before Israel was formed. Heres a timeline of those many attacks against the British.

https://www.palquest.org/en/overallchronology?nid=139&chronos=139

I'd argue that Israel was as much or more a nazi creation as it was the UK.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

If you call our Israeli influence across national boundaries you are called an antisemite and a conspiracy theorist. But here we are, planting zionists in all the worlds leadership positions despite in being unpopular with the voters of "democracies"

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

hey guys, this labour leader is not better. Let's allow "Reform" to win so that they can do the same thing AND purge britain of all the brown people and gay people.

Maybe you can get your straw man to vote for labour!

[–] TheDeadInternet@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's just diet genocide not the same thing.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The UN has called it genocide. I don't even think we can joke about diet genocide anymore. I'm not really sure what other international authority on this type of stuff needs to call it genocide for people to stop tiptoeing around it.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago

The UN is a joke tho.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 22 points 10 hours ago

Tells me everything I needed to know about him

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 17 points 10 hours ago

Splendid, another twat.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 hours ago

It never gets better, the next one is always worse

[–] goferking0 5 points 8 hours ago

He wouldn't be the next in line if he did

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Very enthusiastic slaughter of civilians will do too. Hello Starmer v2.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, and 9/11 was just a navigation error.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

More like a navigation success, amirite?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

It's what we in the bizz call penetration testing.

[–] some_guy 59 points 16 hours ago (9 children)

Oh, awesome. Another genocide apologist.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

What a stupid asshole.

[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 82 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

A second Keir, and just as genocidal

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

But good at talking unlike Keir

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 35 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Wanted to say the same. From the frying pan into the fire. Labour will get wrecked in the next elections.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 19 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Only for the similarly Israel funded Reform to win, because while we keep fighting on whether the next candidate is anti-Israel enough, Reform manages to unite the dumbfucks of the country.

And if Brexit has proven anything it's that the damn country has way too many dumbfucks who'll gladly throw away everything just so a guy who blames the "right" people for the country's troubles gets to be PM.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

So, lesser of two evils is the game? If that's the game we're playing, than will you be voting for Reform or Conservative? Because we can't vote for third parties like Labour. That would be throwing your vote away. The two top parties in the UK right now are Reform and Conservative. If you believe that red lines don't matter, and that all that matters is choosing between one of the two parties that will win, then that means your choice currently is between Reform or Conservative. Labour is a third party. Labour is not a valid choice for anyone trying to be strategic and choose the lesser of two evils.

So, will you be voting Reform or Conservative next election? Or suddenly will the lesser evil no longer apply?

The only way anyone can support Labour right now is if they reject the lesser evil approach. Of course, if you do that, then you have no place whining about the red lines other voters have.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry that I draw the line at genocide.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Same here, we are the worst. Basically terrorists for resisting fascism and genocide. We should be ashamed of our racism.

anywho.. should we make tshirts? bbq maybe?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago

So why you are giving reform and easy win? Labour is to blame of reform wins

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 20 points 15 hours ago

i mean, people could try voting Green, no ? fascist or fascist lite it is ffs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fine, call it a "shadow" genocide, package it with the Epstein files, and let's get the ball rolling on ridding the world leadership of pedophiles!

Or, I'm guessing, we won't.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 hours ago

Or maybe just call it a war?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

What a disgusting excuse for a human being.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 21 points 18 hours ago

At least, not until they're all gone. /s

load more comments
view more: next ›