No Stupid Questions

Because modern young adults don't even know how to socialize with each other these days, let alone organize.

Allow me to present Exhibit A:
https://youtube.com/shorts/kmJsYXuS154

Piped link:
https://piped.video/shorts/kmJsYXuS154

When I was a kid, the only people who went online every day were the quiet nerds like me who preferred a computer over people. People used to make fun of me for going online every single day, now those same people are terminally online just like me. These days even normal people are now unable to socialize.

The weakness of the individual people.

Have you read any books or done any trainings on workplace organising? Most unions provide free training for members who want to organise. I'd leave a book rec too but the main books I've read on the matter are by IRL comrades and I don't really want to dox myself on here.

It's about having the right strategy and knowing how to have these conversations with coworkers. Most people trying to organise a workplace come up against the same barriers. The biggest piece of advice I'd give is focus on active listening—what problems does this person have and care about in their workplace? Don't impose your own problems/the issues you care about most onto them—what's important to them may be different to what's important to you. Find out what they care about, and get them thinking about what might happen if we used our collective power to do something about it. But organising strategy can't be summed up in a Lemmy comment. I do suggest you look into doing a course/workshop/reading a book. You mentioned being in Europe; I think the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung ran online organising workshops for Europeans iirc, not sure if they still do.

The last time there was a serious strike in Seattle, we formed a General Strike Committee, which organized everything. They scheduled trash collection, organized laundry service, delivered food, and took over the hospitals so that healthcare continued. It's trendy in today's politics to act like striking is so easy -- you just stay home from work! just go to the store the day before! -- but to strike fear into the heart of the capitalist, you must provide a credible threat that you can keep on striking indefinitely, and that requires a lot of work and a lot of organization. Who has time for that when they're working 3 jobs just to make rent?

Also the lack of healthcare means people are tied to working long hours, so they dont have free time to just quit a job and protest all the time. its by design, because they know healthcare hostage is one thing keeping people in thier place. propaganda in recent times, have demonizes protests as nothing more than a disruption to daily life. Also one side doesnt protests, aka conservatives where it matters, even when they do protests its likely funded by billionaires anyways.

Have you ever tried to get a large group to unanimously agree to ANYTHING?

Throw in the chance that they may all lose their jobs and it gets exponentially more difficult.

I'll just add that people are generally comfortable^*^. Yeah they bitch and moan about work and their employer, but for the most part they're paying their bills, coming home and enjoying their house(or apartment), watching Netflix, going out to eat, making sure they have groceries, pursuing hobbies, and so on.

Risking all of that and having to trust that everyone else will risk it with you so that it works is a big ask. Plus there's some potential programs that can happen with unions (see other comments) that get propagandized and blown out of proportion by companies trying to convince you they're a bad idea.

^*not everyone, not everywhere^

Cause people gotta eat, dog. They got kids and bills and shit. Ain't complex. Until it is more economically uncomfortable for workers to not strike, than it is to strike, there is very likely no strike, if you get me.

I'm pro-union,

But there are legit downsides to consider.

Most often,

• Minor Problem - Fee's (typically they aren't that much)

• Moderate Problem - Union Management eventually gets big enough, they lose touch with the workers

• Biggest Problem... Union's protect people that absolutely deserve to be fired, and protect the useless far too often. You get stuck with co-workers that by every metric should have been let go, but the Union keeps them.

These are my own anecdotal opinions that I've personally experienced working in both Union and Non-Union situations.

I know you live in Europe, so it's different, but in the US healthcare is almost always tied to a person's employment. If you don't have a job, your family doesn't have medical coverage. Everything everyone else has said is also relevant in the US as well.

I believe it's because

1. The newer generations lack the experience and knowledge of oppression. Too long time has passed since the women in Russia gave their lives for the working class. Too long time has passed since families were ripped apart by the wave of capitalism that was induced by the Industrial Revolution. We have become complacent. You could draw a parallel to how we have forgotten the price of democracy and the fact that democracy isn't a constant or a permanent state of being once achieved but something that has to be fought for continuously in various forms. The same goes for workers' rights.
2. Capitalism is not merely a catalyst of racism, misogyny and otherization. It is also inherently detrimental to democracy, workers' rights and a healthy climate in which one is allowed to find time and energy to meditate on the state of affairs, society, politics, workers' rights and such. We are kept from sparing time and energy to organize and debate. Only monetary productivity remains. Only work is valued.

A strike represents a lot of risk, uncertainty, and variables unaccounted for. People accept the hell they know because the next day's outcome is certain.

For many, it's simply preferable to accept the current system another day than to risk everything for an outcome that may not happen or be what they wanted.

strikes require sacrifice and effort from workers. you need to hear their grievances and bring them together over a specific issue they think is worth it

They're also expensive. Could you afford to not work for a month? What if there are 20 people all going on strike? What if the company just hires all new workers in a week or two? Suddenly the idea of trying to endure it doesn't sound as bad, especially if you have a family.

Probably the last 4 decades of strikes and protests amounting to absolutely fucking nothing. That tends to put people off them.

Strikes happen all the time but only in places that are already unionized. You don't just stage a single day of strike. They are laws governing this like minimal level or services that needs to be maintained during strike. Many well organized groups present their demands and go on strike. I read about successful strikes all the time.

I don't know why some industries are more unionized than others but probably looking into that may give you answers on how to organize people around you.

Living in Europe in a country where you are more or less protected against layouts, were unions are allowed to exist. Jet it is so difficult to get the people to get their head out of their butts to do some solidarity or even improve their own conditions.

It sounds like you're in an anti-Union country that is only pretending to care about worker's rights.

Here in the horrible individualistic pro-capitalism USA workers are struggling to get their unions recognized, largely because once a union is organized there is a whole industry of advocates and lawyers who will push for the bargains to be made, for those bargains to be (at least slightly) better than the law, and for the rights in law or bargain to be protected viciously. And even if you're not in a union, there are sharp public and private mechanisms to respect labor rights.

Not all of the USA is anti-union, and the parts that arent can and do strike when they don't get an honest and fair deal.

The pay and benefits don't need to be good or as good as possible. They just need to be the slightest bit better than the risks and effort of striking.

Becuase they are not organized.

Class conciseness isn't some abstract thing you can rely on you build that conciseness by organizing people.

Instead of complaining, get together with some people in your union that want to fight the boss and take an organizing for power course (or something similar)