this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
686 points (95.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40841 readers
3621 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 27 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'm just gonna say that where I live, it's a criminal offense to pour oil down the drain.

You're not just affecting your landlord. You're affecting your entire neighbourhood.

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Add enough lye and it's non longer oil. Pouring soap down the drain isn't illegal, is it?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

I didn't say pouring soap down is illegal, did I?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Depends if it's an OSSF system or municipal wastewater.

If it's septic, it just fucks the landlord.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

That effects everyone downstream. If you must dispose of grease without a grease trap but you don't want to deal with like a trash bag situation: pour it into a disposable container and throw it in the trash.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If it's something like bacon grease you can just wait for it to congeal and then scooped it into trash and wipe with a paper towel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] protist@retrofed.com 87 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The oil doesn't necessarily just make a problem for your landlord. Fat/oil can clog sewers way down the line, causing problems for entire neighborhoods over time and requiring costly maintenance, which increases the costs of sewer service for everyone

[–] kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And even if it creates a problem for your landlord only, it is you, who is going to pay for it, anyway. They will not just eat the loss - why would they? - they will increase the rent even more, than they would otherwise, to cover the costs.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The whole idea of willingly causing damage somewhere and somehow not being held accountable for it because it's not your property is wild.

If you have your landlord send a plumber to declog a drain clogged by a bunch of grease or wet wipes or some other garbage that shouldn't go down the drain there's no way you won't get the bill for that where I live.

There's renters protection but not against your own acts of misuse.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

It also means that if the home is ever put back onto the market and purchased by a family instead of a landlord, that person will end up dealing with the issue years down the line. It's just overall kind of an edgy, poorly thought out idea.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

So it will affect multiple landlords? 😈

/s

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 19 hours ago

There's no plausible deniability with oil down the drain. The landlord would just bill you for the damage.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 119 points 1 day ago
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I got an email like two weeks ago that there had been an increase on car break-ins recently

Then when it came time to re-sign they decided to increase rent

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Morph9@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pissing in the sink! Classic move

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

It's better to piss in the sink than to sink in the piss

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The benefit of renting is that when shit breaks, maintenance fixes it so that you don't have to muddle your way through trying to replace the oven or some shit. Also you don't have to do yard work. A good landlord is one who understand that his job is to provide housing and maintain the property, and not sit on his ass collecting passive income/hoarding wealth.

You can also up stakes and leave if something goes horribly wrong, and not repeatedly rebuild your house because of natural disasters or be stuck living next to the worst neighbor in history because you still owe $200k on the dirt you're anchored to.

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

This is unfortunately only true when a landlord fixes things beyond the absolute bare minimum (massive globs of caulk on caulk everywhere is my experience).

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

A good landlord is one who understand that his job is to provide housing and maintain the property, and not sit on his ass collecting passive income/hoarding wealth.

I will go ahead and plug Georgism here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 3 points 20 hours ago

I mean... people treat badly everything that is theirs only for a time. Renters and their flats, leasers and their cars, politicians and their countries, borrowers and the tools, leaseholders and the fields...

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget "flushable" wipes

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Your primary residence is a poor investment for several reasons, but the biggest concern is that the investment is not properly diversified.

All that money behind a single home, in a single location, subject to the local regulations, neighbors, climate conditions etc. carries significant idiosyncratic risk that is not compensated for by a corresponding risk premium. You are not paid for taking on avoidable and unnecessary risks, like betting on just one home, when institutional investors can own thousands and diversify away those investment-specific risks. You accept a much higher variance in outcomes for no additional expected value on your investment returns.

That’s on top of the reality that it costs money to own a home, there is significant upkeep and maintenance which can occur unexpectedly, and most home purchases require a mortgage which charges you interest which is typically paid in preference to putting money towards the principal. Landlords can get lower rates for upkeep than an individual can because of their significant bargaining power, such as through negotiation of support contracts.

By all means, buy a home, but don’t buy it because it’s a good investment. Disclaimer: I am a tool, and this is not financial advice.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

I will never rent and buy instead just on principle. I don't want the entirety of the fucking housing market do be owned by a single fuckface that has no idea what paying ridiculous rent prices while working minimum wage feels like, all to be renovicted one day because they have to increase your price SOMEHOW otherwise oh golly their investment returns.

A house should never have been a fucking investment instrument. EVER.

Buying is still miles better than being constantly abused by a landlord.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

Stop treating your home like an investment. Can only end badly

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If only this were true we probably wouldn't have a housing supply crisis.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I mean, individually it's just a poor investment choice. But individuals trying to live in their investment properties isn't really the problem.

The modern housing supply crisis is definitely egged on by a handful of mega-funds that can snap up houses en mass at prices which are already inflated. I'm living next to an aspiring AirBnB landlord's newest acquisition as I speak. Very unlikely she's coming out ahead after a year of renting relative to just holding NVIDIA or Tesla. She's definitely not getting any extra houses under her belt at this rate.

But I might suggest that the "supply crisis" is much more an "unemployment crisis", as the gross supply of housing isn't in shortage. It's the location of the housing, relative to the centers of new commerce.

Case in point, Elon Musk is dumping billions of dollars into Bastrop, to rapidly develop an area that's been overgrazed farmland for centuries. Then, when neighborhoods in Cincinnati and Detroit and even San Antonio have a relative glut of saleable real estate. The... ethnic composition of Bastrop has provided a level of appeal. But so has the pliability of the local government, which has historically been run by libertarian dipshits who spend all their time complaining about the neighboring Austin, TX college kids and granola crunching hippies while insisting deregulation and tax cuts are the only viable pathways to growth.

Now Musk has delivered on the growth, but he's cut out all the locals from its benefit. He's standing up his own little Network State of employee-exclusive bars, storefronts, and housing stocks, while driving long-time residents out with the sudden flood of noise and traffic.

Big investors and employers are engaged in all sorts of regulatory arbitrage and capital flight, often for very shortsighted ego-stroking gains, in order to secure an ideological end goal rather than a profitable business model. The end result is massive shiny new suburban development sometimes directly neighboring areas blighted by economic neglect. People complaining about skyrocketing housing costs who live spitting distance from some of the cheapest real estate available, entirely because of modern day redlining and private segregation.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (13 children)

If the housing market goes into the shitter...

... the renter pays less rent.

... the home "owner" still has to pay the same mortgage, and will continue to pay so they can eventually own the house (actually own it) worth a fraction of what they paid for it.

Unless you have cash on-hand to buy a house, you have to get a mortgage. So it's actually the bank that owns the house, they just let you live there while you pay back a large debt.

The reason why houses are so expensive is because they are considered investments, not just places to live. That creates a politcal incentive to keep housing prices high because a lot of people will lose that "equity" if the price of housing decreased. Most of the benefits listed under home "ownership" centers around a house being an investment.

The boomers aren't getting any younger, as more of them die, more houses go onto the market while the incentive for maintaining that equity for people that already own a house decreases. That "stability" thing listed as a benefit of "owning" a house may not hold true forever.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If the housing market goes into the shitter…

… the renter pays less rent.

In nearly 30 years of renting, the rent has never gone down, regardless of what the market is doing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›