this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
16 points (83.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49175 readers
543 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Parasite (2019) is a Korean movie which got international success and was rated highly due to sharp social commentary on class inequality with a thrilling, genre-bending plot combined together, but the dynamic of the movie is expressed from a SK point of view about economic pressures and modern class divides.

There are also cultural contexts to keep in mind that won't translate into American culture such as:

  • Banjiha housing: The Kim family reside in a semi-basement apartment, which is a distinct urban housing type in Seoul born from historical 1970s civil defense laws.
  • Jjapaguri: The upper-class Mrs. Park orders jjapaguri (a mix of two instant noodles, Chapagetti and Neoguri) topped with expensive Korean beef Hanwoo, a specific local comfort food combo.
  • National health exams: There are specific plot points relying on South Korea's public health system and annual medical checkup schedules.
  • Suseok: The gift of a decorative viewing stone satirizes traditional Korean middle-class aspirations for wealth and prestige.

Even if they could recreate an English-language remake of Parasite, would there have to be adjustments in order to suit American subculture? As in, Suseok isn't a thing in America and Westerners don't eat Jjapaguri, so they may replace that with something entirely different or swap Jjapaguri for another noodle dish or pasta.

Will a US remake really carry the same impact as the original if it were to be created? Would it be good or turn out terrible as it’s hard to capture what makes the original special for audiences?

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Really depends on the director and how they adapt it.

Despite Hollywood's horrendous reputation around recycled IPs, their adaptations of foreign media have actually turned out quite good for several films, although arguably nothing compares to the original.

The Departed was a remake of Infernal Affairs and there are still mile long threads to this day arguing about which one you should watch.

tbf though I wouldn't keep my hopes too high because there is a ocean full of poor adaptations and sequels, regardless of the quality of the original media or even when reusing the exact same film team.

[–] John_Greene@lemy.nl 1 points 16 hours ago

I dunno man, people love to shit on remakes nowadays but so many great movies in the past have been remakes. I'm talking about classics like Scarface or For A Fistfull Of Dollars. And yeah obviously the American remake wouldn't have them eating with chopsticks and shit

[–] MonaySimpson@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago

I doubt those cultural contexts were understood by most of the west, and yet it was successful.

It goes to reason then that a western remake doesn't need them specifically.

But yeah. Have a fucking original idea Hollywood. I've given up watching remakes and sequels.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Fuck no, and a remake is dumb

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guarantee the rich family will be more blatantly evil as a way for the rich Hollywood fucks to go "See, they're so much worse than us. You wouldn't rebel against US would you?"

The family will probably be "broke" still but live in an expansive Manhattan high-rise apartment like so many movies and series before it.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm having a hard time imagining that the end-result would be anything other than a watered down copy that has been focus tested to fail completely at hilighting the societal differences between the people upstairs and downstairs.

I bet the first half would be overly goofy, and the second half more akin to slapstick. I have not a shred of belief that they'll be able to capture tiny details such as the head of the house literally stepping over someone bleeding out (or was she already dead?) to focus on his son.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even though it is an HBO show that is being written and directed by the same guy who made the movie?

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That does make me slightly less pessimistic, but the target audience remains the same.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The same target audience that loved the original movie and swept it at the Oscars?

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Idk if it will turn out good or not, but I don’t think the problems you mentioned are really an issue. I assume they aren’t just going to shoot a one to one remake with English actors, it’d be adapted to the culture it’s being presented in. (To be clear, I haven’t heard anything about the remake, this is just speaking generally.) Sort of like how there’s a US and UK “The Office” which aren’t just the same show but different actors.

While those specific cultural examples couldn’t just slot into a movie set in America, the themes still fit really well. It’s not like the US doesn’t have economic inequality and all. There’s a reason why Parasite and Squid Game got such international attention despite language and cultural differences.

That said, I’m generally anti-remake/franchise. Come up with your own original ideas dammit!

Also, I sure do love jelly-filled donuts.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No.

American remakes are generally terrible.

[–] Steve@communick.news -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They're generally not.
They're typically an improvement in production quality. They only place they're weaker sometimes, is when they try to make substantive changes to the story. That can be hit or miss.

[–] John_Greene@lemy.nl 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I mean I agree that there's plenty of good to decent American remakes, but higher production value doesn't necessarily make for a better movie man. Movies are an art form and there's all sorts of things like style and tone that money isn't necessarily going to solve for you. Sometimes a movie's lower production value can add to it even if the filmmakers are inventive enough.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Provide some examples? The only recent ("recent") remake I can think of that was better than the original is....The Office lol

[–] John_Greene@lemy.nl 1 points 16 hours ago

American Office is unwatchable for me

[–] Steve@communick.news 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Girl with the Dragon Tatoo
Let Me In > Let the Right One In
The Ring > Ringu
The Italian Job
Insomnia
12 Monkies > La Jetée
True Lies > La Totale!
The Departed > Infernal Affairs

They all have better production quality. Most keep the same story with minor alterations. A few make real story improvement or expansion.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks, didn't realize those last 3 were remakes.

I liked girl with the dragon tattoo but was kinda meh on the rest. Only saw the original of the ring, though

[–] John_Greene@lemy.nl 1 points 16 hours ago

Dragon Tattoo is the one where I thought the original was better, but the remake is also very good. They have a different style

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Boon Joon Ho has been very clear about the Parasite TV show not being a remake. He says it is a story that takes place in the same universe.

First and foremost, the only measure of success in US entertainment is eyes on screen. How much money it makes at the Box Office or number of watches. Nothing else matters.

Now with that said, there is a long history of Horror movies making sharp social commentary in the US, actually when I think about it, the best social commentary in movies is in horror movies.

  • The primary subtext of Dawn of the Living Dead is the absurdity of consumerism in the US.
  • Invasion of the Body Snatchers is an allegory of the Red Scare, that took place in the 50s.
  • The Long Walk just did illustrated the shittiness of the draft and the stupidity of war.
  • They Live is a critique of how the Elite are controlling society.
  • Rosemary’s Baby is all about a women’s right to choose.
  • And many more.

Would there have to be adjustments to suite American Culture?

Yes of course.

[–] SingularEye@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure the Hollywood version will not be good, but it won't be because of those cultural factors. It's not hard to find equivalents to certain cultural artifacts, and rearrange plot points to fit a different setting. What the American film will fail to do is to be as biting in its satire of class differences, because Hollywood executives think it won't sell well.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m sure the Hollywood version will not be good, but it won’t be because of those cultural factors. It’s not hard to find equivalents to certain cultural artifacts, and rearrange plot points to fit a different setting. What the American film will fail to do is to be as biting in its satire of class differences, because Hollywood executives think it won’t sell well.

I agree there, I don't think it's impossible or even difficult to make the movie that hits the same themes the same way, there's absolutely zero thought in my head that it's not possible to make something purely with American culture, systems, housing and foods that conveys 100% of the same message, in some ways possibly even better

However, there is a very high chance that somewhere in the production line decisions are made by someone who either determines that the things that made the movie popular, aren't compatible with American audiences, and will intentionally dumb them down or change the actual themes.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Parasite is not a movie that makes sense for a spin-off, remake or sequel. The very idea of a "Parasite" franchise is revolting. And yet, here we are.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There are so many cases I've seen of some piece of art getting commodified in ways that just kind of fly in the face of the original work.

The one that always comes to mind is Madoka Magica.

SpoilersThe twist in the show is that the magical girls' souls have been essentially turned into objects alienated from their bodies. They're forced to work for someone exploiting their needs and are discarded when they are no longer useful.

So it feels super weird and gross to make a bunch of figures and merch of the characters, literally objectifying/commodifying them.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

There are pretty direct analogues to all these in US culture, but I still don't think the remake (I prefer the term translation) would be good.

The movie was huge in America and sparked a ton of debate about our own inequalities. Everyone who watched the movie pretty much "got it," even if some specifically Korean bits went over their heads

It's not categorically impossible, but unlikely. However it seems the American version will instead be a HBO show.

Bong is teaming up with “The Big Short” and “Vice” director Adam McKay to co-executive produce the series. It’s supposed to be an English language remake of the Oscar-winning film, but with more subplots and characters.

The guy who directed the Anchorman and Ricky Bobby movies isn't giving me a lot of hope. Even more serious stuff like "The Big Short" doesn't seem like a qualifier to handle this type of social commentary. I'd much rather see someone like the Coen brothers who are known for wry dry sarcasm and microfocusing on small communities.

Adding more "characters and subplots" sounds like an attempt justifying more episodes, the source had a fleshed out world in a movie. Are we adding things that actually improve the story or padding the numbers?

Idk, I'll eat my words if it turns out great, I just don't see much reason to get my hopes up.

[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An American remake can only go wrong.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You sure about that?

  • The Departed
  • The Birdcage
  • 12 Monkeys
  • A Fist Full of Dollars
  • Insomnia
  • The Parent Trap
  • CODA
  • The Magnificent Seven
[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I am sure about that.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What are The Departed and 12 Monkeys remake of?

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Departed is a remake of a Chinese (Hong Kong) film called Infernal Affairs.

12 Monkeys is a remake of a French movie called La Jetée.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I would not call 12 Monkeys a remake, its inspired by La Jetee.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I would throw in Bugonia (US) > Save the Green Planet! (SK) as well.