this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
363 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30610 readers
2382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge on Thursday denied a request by more than two dozen Democratic states to halt a Trump administration policy announced last month that would require Medicaid recipients with terminal diseases to prove they are too sick to work in order to be exempt from new work requirements that go into effect this coming January.

While introducing over $1 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans, last year’s massive GOP tax and budget bill also imposed new 80-hour-per-month work requirements that states must implement for Medicaid expansion recipients, who receive government-subsidized insurance coverage at or below 138% of the poverty line.

The law specified that those who are “medically frail or otherwise have special medical needs” are excluded from the work requirement, and specifically listed people with a “serious or complex medical condition.” But it remained unclear what exact conditions met these criteria.

Earlier this month, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a new rule stating that even if a person receives a terminal diagnosis for a disease like cancer, HIV/AIDS, or Parkinson’s, that is still not enough for them to be exempt from the work requirements.

Beginning on January 1, 2028, it says they must also demonstrate to states that their condition “significantly impairs” their ability to meet the work requirement.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago

No government benefit work requirements until the Mitch McConnell Equal Work Requirements for Congress bill is passed.

Pass the MMEWRC now!

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

work till you die. WHILE you die.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

Give us all your money, too. It's not like you're gonna need it after you die. Which we'll make sure you do.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 97 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

well then mitch mcconnell better get the fuck back to work

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

Oh, no, they don't mean THEM.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 5 points 8 hours ago

He is hard a work right now from his hospital resting place, but no you can't have any evidence because it's classified.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

That's Entertainment!

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Does this mean Mitch McConnell isn't exempt from work requirements too?

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They don't even need to prove he is alive to keep getting paid.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They're rebuilding him: faster, louder, more right wing. Mecha-Mitch 1700. Runs on orphan blood.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 19 hours ago

Don’t be silly.

[–] zane@infosec.pub 8 points 15 hours ago

Oh look. Further evidence we're all fucking slaves. Time to eat some fat fucks face off.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck is judges rational for denying this? I hope fucking judge gets fucking terminal ass cancer and force to work.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago

He's MAGA, and he hates American citizens.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 29 points 19 hours ago

Remember: the cruelty is the point.

[–] Sir_Gkar@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Of course. They would much rather see poor people with expensive needs die off. Your life has no value to these fascist ghouls. Not unless they can extract something of value from you.

The whole idea of a work requirement for medicaid is insane. You can't mooch off healthcare to support yourself, it isn't a replacement for income. If anything, this will only cause more people to become unable to work because they lose access to the care that helps keep them in the workforce.

It's completely backwards. They want you to be outraged because some poor person might get government funded healthcare without having a job. The real outrage is that employers can pay workers a low enough wage that they need government assistance to make up the difference.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 11 points 17 hours ago

Trump is literally devaluing US American lives in real dollars to then funnel that the money from the citizens into his pocket.

Not a complicated con. But somehow impossible to stop ?

[–] savvie@lemmy.zip 44 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

because nearly dead patients need to be self- reliant, & use their bootstraps to glorify the great god Orangutan Cheetoh whilst they breathe their final breath, in Jesus Christ’s name, amen!!!

[–] cavitationfetishist01@quokk.au 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Well yeah. If they're all used up, and my company can't extract any more value, why are your tax dollars keeping the unmployed alive?

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

they people need to be made an example of, put in their own worst hell.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 27 points 20 hours ago

The cruelty is the point

[–] Nobody@anarchist.nexus 14 points 18 hours ago

Always a pleasure when they add a fuck you to struggling people in the bills cutting taxes for billionaires.

Just in case you didn’t know where you stand in the active class war being waged against you every single day.

[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 16 points 19 hours ago

I'm sorry, work where, exactly?

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes I hope hell is a real place.

[–] mildseason@sopuli.xyz -2 points 12 hours ago

It is! Living in Gaza sounds hellish. Unfortunately the people that made this decision live somewhere close to heaven.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Can someone please give a second solution to everything that's going on?

Where is the second solution?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

[removed by reddit]