this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
411 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86757 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

Let us remember ALPRs have been around fora while now, and the fervor we're building to dismantle Flock we need to quietly extend to all ALPR services actively feeding unwarranted surveillance data to law enforcement and federal paramilitaries.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 12 points 7 hours ago

Clearly professional operatives paid by China to ensure America falls behind in unwanted surveillance technology 🤔. /s

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 48 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

This article reminded me to check deflock.me where I found that in the last 90 days my city finally got a Flock camera. There's only one but I've been driving by the damn thing every day on my way to work without realizing it.

I'd like to know whose responsible for it; City, County, or State but regardless I now have a decision to make.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 hours ago

I've heard sometimes they just put up the cameras and ask for permission from the city after.

[–] ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for this link, wasn't aware of it. I am now aware that my city and the surrounding cities are fucking flooded with them all over. 😐

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Get ‘em while they’re hot!

One day, these things are going to be novelty items with a pretty neat history about surveillance capitalism and Americans efforts to fight back. Having one, by that point, will be pretty awesome.

[–] ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

Just one? Good reason to be a hoarder or collector.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 85 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Much like health insurance CEOs getting waxed, destroying flock cameras seems to be one thing almost everyone agrees on.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 23 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

The next stage of this is going to be models of Flock cameras that look like other common security cameras, or a Flock module that plugs into existing security cameras and adds them to the network.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The next stage of this is having cops patrol flock cameras.

The whole 'mass surveillance' thing sort of does away with a need for traditional patrols.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 13 points 10 hours ago

How long do you figure before they get the Flock AI declared a police officer, therefore any damage to an AI-enabled device counts as assaulting an officer?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Aren't flock camera more than just cameras as they scan for Bluetooth / wifi devices

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 6 hours ago

I mean, plenty of security cameras have WiFi capabilities. Adding bluetooth wouldn't be a very big lift. It definitely wouldn't be big enough to prevent a smaller form factor.

[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Yes, they are static wardriving nodes as well as cameras

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 11 hours ago

Sure, but there's no reason they couldn't be built into an enclosure that looks like other security cameras.

Alternatively, you just build a little box that has that extra stuff and plugs into a normal security camera, and you bury the box in the ground or put it inside a locked utility cabinet or something.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I Need to show this video to someone i know

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago

Mass Surveilance System... Online.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If only people would be this militant about the sensor node they carry around all the time.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

That sensor node comes with lots of direct benefits for the person carrying it. Flock cameras have literally zero direct benefits.