491
submitted 11 months ago by nave@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 205 points 11 months ago

It would be pretty funny for a court to actually determine that a “just business” is synonymous with “doing evil”

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago

/r/selfawarewolves

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 129 points 11 months ago

Can’t fool me, they gave it away when they removed “Don’t be evil” from their motto back in 2015.

[-] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

The first time I saw the slogan all I could think is "a normal not-evil person doesn't need to make such a disclaimer".

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 102 points 11 months ago

These are not mutually exclusive statements.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 63 points 11 months ago

That venn diagram would make a functional wheel.

[-] alonely0@programming.dev 75 points 11 months ago

A publicly traded company is legally obligated to be evil.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 19 points 11 months ago

Are you perhaps referring to the myth that the law requires companies to maximize shareholder profits above all else?

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

Ok I was ready to disparage your link since the domain ends in .ai, but actually that was a decent read and a pretty good argument. I'm glad to have better knowledge of the actual court rulings.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 11 months ago

I didn't even look at the URL, to be honest; it was the most layman-friendly and succinct article that was from the last few years that popped up in a quick search, but there's plenty of similar articles from other sources if anyone doubts this one.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

There is no law that says they must. But shareholders are justified to fire C suite who don't. And realistically shareholders only care about profits. Therefore they effectively must. Regardless of it not being "law".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boogiepop@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago

Is profit at any cost morally irresponsible?

No, it's the consumers who are wrong.

[-] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 58 points 11 months ago

We can and should no longer accept "it's just good business" as justification for morally reprehensible actions.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 11 months ago

Accepting it is what makes it good business. We stop accepting it, it costs money and then it's no longer good business.

Business is purely profit driven. We need to make morally wrong things costly. Orders of magnitude more costly than doing the right thing.

Blame the ayer AND fix the game.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

Ah, so that's why they changed their slogan from "don't be evil" to "don't not be a business."

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

"Google - Business with electrolytes"

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

It's what shareholders crave

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Does he not know that business IS evil?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kaibae@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

Okay. Google isn’t evil, business is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Befernafardofo@feddit.it 40 points 11 months ago

Slavery was just business at some point, what kind of justification is this?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Veraxus@kbin.social 38 points 11 months ago

So… evil.

“That’s not a shit, it’s a doodie!”

[-] m13@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Capitalism is a curse that instills the most evil traits in all of humanity.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Worse; it rewards them.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

No, businesses are people. Corporations have fought to make that a distinction. So therefore it can be evil. Can’t have it both ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RedDoozer@lemmy.zip 29 points 11 months ago

Business are soulless evils

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 27 points 11 months ago

“Hey man, just doing our job to maximize shareholder value”

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

Good argument for dismantling Google and any other company of similar size.

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 24 points 11 months ago

"Nothing ~~Personal~~ evil, Kid"

"Just Business"

[-] nomecks@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

A business is only as moral as its least moral shareholder. Shareholder Primacy is the law.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

It can be two things, jackass.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

You can see how one could easily be confused…

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago
[-] Orioz@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Don't. Be evil.

Ifify

[-] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

No one thinks they're the bad guy. That doesn't change the fact that their actions speak for themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
491 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58429 readers
7121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS