198
submitted 9 months ago by JonsJava@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 127 points 9 months ago

So they're lowering the bar, then?

[-] ripened_avacado@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago

You can put it in as a link with an exclamation point to imbed the GIF. ! [Description] (Link) without the spaces

Ba dum chsss

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 111 points 9 months ago

After law school, candidates will spend 675 hours working under the supervision of an experienced attorney and create a portfolio of legal work that bar officials will grade as an alternative to the traditional bar exam.

So, still basically a test, but now more like 4 months of underpaid/free labor.

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

The bar I took cost something like $2000 including two months of prep classes on top of law school. Then more money for a hotel stay so I could take a two day test. I would have preferred 4 months apprenticeship paid or no.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

You think travelling to and from unpaid work for four months is better than paying $2k and a hotel for one night?

Average 21 working days a month, commute at $10 a day which is a very low estimate for the US, and its $840 + 2 months of lost wages.

At minimum wage that’s $2320 before tax… but we’re talking (hopefully) intelligent people who can earn significantly more.

At $20/h we’re looking at $6400 in lost wages by comparison to the old system you have described.

This is bad for workers as its putting a greater financial barrier on entering the profession.

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I gave you my opinion, from my experience . If you’ve taken a bar and that’s your opinion, fine.

The primary barrier to entry into the legal profession is law school, not the licensing exam.

4 months of legal apprenticeship with a side gig isn’t bad. However, I would imagine that most applicants will be doing 4 months of paid clerkship with enough extra unpaid hours to meet the bar’s criteria.

[-] soloner@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I would think 4 months would also help your resume. But then again, not sure if not having the bar exam could hurt your resume? Curious your opinion.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 16 points 9 months ago

That's still lower than what's required to do hair/nails here in Oregon. My buddy had to drop $25k on some shitty for-profit school to become a barber.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

While your friend’s story is BS and a reflection of some absurd laws, I assure you law school is longer lol

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

If it’s paid reasonable (let’s say, paralegal level? I dunno) then I see no problem.

Some firms- especially the small ones- might do this. Most won’t and that’s the problem.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 9 months ago

A practicum is required for some professions, like professional engineering. The standard for engineering is four years with a bachelor's degree and passing two tests. You can read engineering in a couple of states without going to college, but it takes 15 years experience and you still need to pass one of the tests.

[-] Confound4082@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

If you're referring to the FE and PE tests as being required. They are required to be able to get the extra cert, but not to be am engineer. Most engineers are not PEs, and you don't have to pass the FE exam to be an engineer.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago

You do to become a stamping engineer, and the stamping privilege is the difference between and engineering graduate and a professional engineer.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 months ago

I specified Professional Engineer, which is different from engineers that work on products covered by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

I get that you can have engineers in fields that don't need licensure.

[-] Confound4082@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Even in civil/archE, most of 'em don't have their PE.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Come to the UK where it's now going to be two years of qualifying experience on top of exams in a highly competitive field working for minimum wage if you manage to work 40 hours and not more.

To get to that point that you actually start on the qualification can take a few years post law degree and nowhere near all law graduates get to that point.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

After law school, candidates will spend 675 hours working under the supervision of an experienced attorney

Just as we're relearning that apprenticeships are a possible alternative to college, the law comes along and says "¿Por que no los dos?"

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lol, that's cute, say doctors everywhere. With the 8 years of post secondary education and 3-8 years plus of 80 hours a week apprenticeship after that. They figured out doing both long ago. And grad students well on their way too with post doc positions.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I realized that after I posted. Architects also have a post-degree apprenticeship period before they can go through licensure (or can even call themselves architects).

[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Engineers too. A 4-5 year degree, then an exam to get engineer in training status, then a few years apprenticeship, then another exam to get a license that allows them to sign off on projects. Although, a friend of mine never bothered taking the last exam, he just has to work under another engineer.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Don’t we have proof that you can’t learn while sleep deprived? And that doctors spend years learning on 4 hours of sleep?

Sounds like they spend the same amount of time learning.

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

No way that could ever go sideways… 🤦

[-] Aliendelarge@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Guess I can start a new career next year!

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Lionel Hutz was a man before his time.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 9 months ago

\I'm a lawyer!\

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

What wrong with that, they’re just “practicing” law!

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
198 points (97.6% liked)

News

22488 readers
5093 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS