315

CLAIM: Security camera footage from Jan. 6, 2021, shows a federal agent disguised as a supporter of then-President Donald Trump during the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The footage shows Kevin James Lyons, a Chicago man who was sentenced in July to more than four years in federal prison for his role in the attack. Multiple images of Lyons at the Capitol, dressed as he is in the footage, appear in court documents.

THE FACTS: After House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday began releasing thousands of hours of footage from the Capitol insurrection, social media users — including members of Congress — seized on a clip they claimed proved that undercover federal agents participated in the riot.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago

Ahh, I see. So their real purpose all along in releasing footage was to use it as propaganda, not to get to the truth. Is anybody surprised by this?

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Most of us assumed this the moment he announced its release.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 77 points 1 year ago

As I said when Johnson released the footage, it's not going to be any change to what know really happened, there's just going to be all sorts of wild conspiracy theories coming out of idiots seeing blurry images and claiming false things, and the fact checks will disprove them but the fact checks don't get spread to the people who believe the false claims.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Worse, those people have convinced themselves that fact checkers are "deep state," so the presence of fact checkers debunking their claims they just take as further confirmation, because "why would the deep state have to try and debunk something if it wasn't true in the first place?"

These people have left object reality and we can't keep pretending that we can bring them back with truth and logic.

Edit: typo

[-] thisbenzingring 14 points 1 year ago

Kinda like religious absolutists

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

"any argument against my faith is the devil tempting me"

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is unclear exactly what Lyons is holding in his right hand when he flashes his palms.

It is 100% clear what Lyons is holding in his right hand when he flashes his palms. It's a vape.

@snaptastic, don't forget to check my comment for relevancy.

[-] hibsen@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Jesus. I don't even vape and I can tell what that is just from seeing people use them around town.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

What's the deal with the snaptastic thing? Keep seeing it.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Jesus Christ between tagging that dude and using the tritest non-comment in history ("I bEt YoU'rE fUn At PaRtIeS") you sound exhausting as fuck

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 22 points 1 year ago

In the picture I saw it looked like one of those card deck shaped vape pens with the mouthpiece sticking out of the top.

[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It’s absolutely a box style vape mod.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The cons latch onto some of the dumbest things ever.

And of course, they cannot even be consistent. At the same time as this dumb Qanon-style idiocy, they also cry about how they are "political prisoners" and get wood at the idea of the orange blob pardoning the insurrectionists.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure I’m following the comments. It was republicans who made the badge claim, so doesn’t this hurt them?

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Can't prove them wrong if they close their eyes and put their fingers in their ears.

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Not certain I'm following your question well: R's and randos started the claim that j6 had an undercover agent involved and that there's a video,that was just by R's, released that proves that. If you're watching disinformational videos, then adds to the idea that J6 was a setup and that R's are trying to ve transparent. This article clarifies that the video doesn't show an agent at J6.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Only if their supporters cared about facts. Considering we're talking about MAGAs/republicans, it's safe to assume the truth is immaterial to their talking points.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation. Every word. Honesty has never been a conservative trait.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Does it matter? They won't admit they were wrong, they'll double down.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world -5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


CLAIM: Security camera footage from Jan. 6, 2021, shows a federal agent disguised as a supporter of then-President Donald Trump during the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The footage shows Kevin James Lyons, a Chicago man who was sentenced in July to more than four years in federal prison for his role in the attack.

THE FACTS: After House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday began releasing thousands of hours of footage from the Capitol insurrection, social media users — including members of Congress — seized on a clip they claimed proved that undercover federal agents participated in the riot.

“And that ladies and gentlemen is a badge… with a red hat and fully disguised,” reads one post on X that shared a screenshot of the footage paused as Lyons is flashing his palms.

In another, he sits in a car holding a framed photograph from Pelosi’s office, which shows her with the late Congressman John Lewis, a civil rights movement icon who died in July 2020.

More than 700 have been sentenced, with roughly two-thirds receiving terms of imprisonment ranging from three days to 22 years.___This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online.


The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

This is actually a bad summary, misses important points like: the misinformation refers to a clip in which Lyons shows his palms in a way similar to how an agent flashes a badge. No badge was really in hand and we was sentenced for his participation in the protest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That is often true of this bot.

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
315 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS