378
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 165 points 1 year ago

He changed his tune in a later arbitration case with Netflix, where he claimed that not only was the money contractually his to do with what he pleased, but Netflix owed him more than $14 million in unpaid invoices.

The absolute sack on this guy lmao

[-] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago

That's how you get blacklisted from Hollywood.

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 year ago

With 55 million, do you even care lol

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

I feel it depends how much of that money is still left useful.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Wanna buy dogecoins?

[-] hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social 105 points 1 year ago

If you're reading this, Netflix, I'm willing to do the exact same thing for just $40 million.

[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I’ll do it for just $500K and it’ll be a series about a man (me, extra savings on casting) wildly misspending the money battling a capitalist society run amok by paying off his mortgage and student loans. Episodes are about 30 secs to 1 min, depending how long the payment sites take to load.

[-] hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago

$500k will only barely get you a Rolls Royce Phantom, though 😞 Nobody should be expected to work under such horrible conditions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pelley@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

Is this why they had to raise their prices again?

[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Netflix had in 2023 roughly 247 Million paying user (they say). Blowing 50 Mil. is like 0.20$ for every user. It was mostly a mix of inflation, greed and shareholder demand for profit increase (also greed) that made you pay now more, for barely the same service/product.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 30 points 1 year ago

*worse service

The crackdown on sharing accounts didn't personally affect me, but it was still one of the reasons I dropped it

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I got annoyed that the price kept going up and the quality of the shows went down, or there was just too much crap to filter out in order to watch something good. A lot of shows I like would randomly get cancelled, like Kim's Convenience, Altered Carbon and others I can't think of now.

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

The good news is that there's going to be a riveting Netflix documentary about it,

[-] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

Going to honest, I'm more likely to watch that than what they were supposed to make.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Unless the doc's director also runs away with the money, a double bamboozle

[-] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

When Netflix acquiesced and wired the money, Rinsch sent most of it directly to his personal Charles Schwab account, and made big bets on biotech firm Gilead Sciences, and on shorting the S&P 500 index. In just a few weeks he’d lost $5.9 million. Cutting his losses, Rinsch pulled $4 million from his Schwab account and put it directly into Dogecoin. Wow, such invest.

Hahaha they gave $millions to a guy from r/wallstreetbets

[-] 50MYT@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

He turned the $4m doge into like $17m didn't he?

[-] gnurd@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago
[-] 50MYT@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Perfect. Haha

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I don't know, but that would mean he was luckier, not less stupid.

[-] li10@feddit.uk 49 points 1 year ago

The guy’s obviously mentally ill, but sounds like the only reason he ever got that much money was because of a bidding war.

Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in, and just copying each other to try and get what the other wants 🤦‍♂️

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Must have been those big smart "decision makers" that figures this one out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Welcome to Netflix! You're greenlighted!

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They're doing this with everything now. Corporate trends are deciding "Return to Office" a decade after jumping on the Work from Home bandwagon. They're all moving to "unlimited" PTO, because people use less on average than an allotted account, and they can monitor and punish anyone who uses more.

It's almost like the MBAs are trained to just follow each other.

[-] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in

I bet there's some assistant out there working under some Netflix production exec going I fucking knew it

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

I don’t think unproven director is the issue here

How does he move it all to a personal account?

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago

Are we sure he didn't think he was hired to be the CEO?

[-] PlatinumSf@pawb.social 35 points 1 year ago

So this is where the money for my next season of Inside Job went? Fuck you Netflix 😩

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

How the fuck can they just cut the series in the middle of a season? It was a great show.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

At this point if you are watching a Netflix show immediately after it starts airing, thats on you. What more do they need to do to prove they will drop any show the second it fails to meet their viewing requirements.

Basically cant even start watching a Netflix show until it's a season or two in.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

They will spend $500k to make a documentary about this, pump it up to hit #1, and at the end of the day net the same results: $55.5 million spent to have the #1 show.

[-] Jyrdano@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Judging by the story in the article, the doc would be hundred times more interesting than the nonexistent tv show anyway.

Those poor shareholders, my heart just breaks for them

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It won't even touch them. It will come out of the pockets of lower level employees or future projects.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Netflix really needs to vet their projects better.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

This just means they get to cancel a few of their good shows now. Their favorite thing to do.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

hey netflix give me Millions of dollars and ill make a tv show for you

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, good for him lol

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Hey Netflix, I'm available too to make a sci-fi series. I'm an unproven director who can put something together for only like... $50 million. Totally worth your money.

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I'll do it for $25 million. Hire me instead.

[-] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

$25 million?! These guys are trying to rip you off. I can do it for $10 million. I'll even supply my own cast of (also unproven) actors!

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Can they not sue on a case like this?

[-] StarManta@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

And get what money? The money’s spent, it’s gone, and the directors not getting another big payday like this ever again. They can spend $10k on lawyers to get the $216 in his checking account.

[-] gnurd@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Article says it's in arbitration so it's not like they aren't doing anything about it. And one can assume they're still paying their lawyers quite a bit during the arbitration. Also the person can be forced to sell off assets to pay for damages.

Also at the end of the article it says he pulled out 27 million he made in doge coin from 4 million he invested of Netflix's money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They maybe can get him for wirefraud which means jail time. I don't know Im no lawyer though.

[-] gnurd@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The article says it's in arbitration which is basically the same thing, sans an actual court.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe they have insurance over the project and can recover some of the money. The company I work for sell this kind of insurance, but is usually for construction projects.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

[-] EvilTwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Rolls-Royces, Crypto, And Dodgy Stock Bets

That's a funny way to spell cocaine and hookers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
378 points (98.2% liked)

Television

4628 readers
120 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS