303
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Texas judge on Thursday granted an emergency order allowing a pregnant woman whose fetus has a fatal diagnosis to get an abortion in the state.

Late last month, Kate Cox, a 31-year-old Dallas-area mother of two who is about 20 weeks pregnant, found out that her developing fetus has trisomy 18, a rare chromosomal disorder likely to cause stillbirth or the death of the baby shortly after it’s born.

Cox told NBC News Thursday afternoon that she was “hopeful” and very grateful after the judge’s decision.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fsr1967@lemmy.world 78 points 9 months ago

Good. Now do it for the rest of the women in Texas who want abortions.

[-] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Especially, but not exclusively, the ones who need it as well.

[-] fsr1967@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 75 points 9 months ago

Texas: where the Party of "small government" forces you to appeal your personal health decisions to judges and politicians...

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

These must be those death panels Republicans warned us of when the Affordable Care Act passed.....

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Lawyers making medical decisions instead of patients and doctors.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 64 points 9 months ago

When you have to go to court to get abortion

[-] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, and if someone receives the diagnosis too late then there may not be time to go to court and still perform the procedure before it's too late. This woman was lucky to have lawyers working on her behalf.

Now the Republicans will always point to the few examples such as this one to claim their system is merciful and fair. It's such BS though, as if a judge's opinion on a medical issue matters one bit against those of doctors.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, and if someone receives the diagnosis too late then there may not be time to go to court and still perform the procedure before it’s too late. This woman was lucky to have lawyers working on her behalf.

And lets be realistic, money.

Bans on abortion, even a nationwide ban, is just a ban on abortion for the poor.

  • the rich can fly to another country to get an abortion without even thinking about the time or costs
  • the middle class can drain their retirement savings, get a second mortgage, or sell their few valuables to be able to get enough money to fly to another country to get an abortion

The only the poor don't have enough resources to get an abortion, so the poor are forced to give birth. This is the republican dream made real.

[-] Hillock@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

While I wish it wasn't necessary to go take these steps, the cost of going to a different country for an abortion are much smaller than you imply.

The total cost to get a surgical abortion in Canada is at most USD 5,000. That includes flight, hotel, the procedure, and going back to Canada for a checkup after 2-3 weeks. That's still a lot of money but not take a second mortgage money.

Depending on the exact clinic and circumstances the total for a surgical could be closer to USD 2,500.

If you notice the pregnancy early and can get a medical abortion the total cost is below USD 1,000 and that includes 3-4 nights in Canada so you don't have to take any medication into the US.

Again having to go through this is bullshit and it is still more money than some can afford. But I don't want anyone reading your comment to think it costs tens of thousands of dollars to get an abortion out of the country.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

First, I really appreciate you laying out some actual numbers for people reading this post. I'm glad you're providing this information.

While I wish it wasn’t necessary to go take these steps, the cost of going to a different country for an abortion are much smaller than you imply.

...and...

That’s still a lot of money but not take a second mortgage money.

The middle class itself is a range of incomes and financial situations. Sadly, many in the USA firmly in the middle class would find and extreme struggle to come up with $5k USD unplanned.

56% of Americans can't cover a $1,000 emergency expense with savings

I was trying to drive the point home that the only ones that don't have the option through any means are the poor.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Next up, the state appeals, prolonging the case until this godless harlot has no choice but to birth her already dead child just like the good Lord, our Savior, Republican Jesus, would want it.

Obligatory/s

[-] hailsatan@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Even worse, seems like the texas AG is threatening to prosecute her or any hospital that participates:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/texas-judge-allows-woman-get-emergency-abortion-despite-state-ban-2023-12-07/

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Couldn't the judge hold him in contempt of court for it, though? Not that it'll happen.

[-] SheeEttin@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

A judge can hold anyone in contempt, for any reason, for any length of time. But I think it extremely unlikely here, because usually the judiciary and the prosecution are on the same side.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago

Requiring trials and lawsuits to determine whether or not you can get a basic medical procedure is called SMALL GOVERNMENT!

[-] Late2TheParty@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

How magnanimous to allow someone to do with their body what they choose.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 13 points 9 months ago

Seems sane.

Until someone sues the mother, the hospital, the doctor, the judge and the state for something something Jesus.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The Texas AG is planning on doing just that.

[-] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I'm overwhelmed by the amount of dumb in the world.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Is it weird that I'm shocked that the Texas judge approved her request? That's pretty fucked that this is news, and that I'm shocked that the judge approved her request. That's the state of the world we live in, where this is shocking news.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
303 points (98.7% liked)

News

22831 readers
4156 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS