352
submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 65 points 9 months ago

once again, a child was shot, the shooter will be rewarded, and a bunch of people who did nothing wrong will pay for it

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is why calling cops to solve family disputes is a bad idea. They peddle violence, and to a hammer everything looks like a nail.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd agree in many cases but not this one.

This wasn't a husband, it was a father of one of the women's kids. He didn't live there, and he showed up "irate" at 4am. She felt unsafe, and not unreasonably so. If you genuinely feel unsafe and can't leave the situation (for any number of reasons), that's when you roll the dice and call the cops.

This is also a black woman living in Mississippi, so even if she's lucky enough to have never been on the receiving end of shitty police behavior, she possibly had a better appreciation than most what might show up at her door if she called them. She was still unnerved enough to call. Maybe she didn't think it through, but again, I don't think it was the wrong impulse.

[-] Million@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

Roll the dice on calling the cops, the way its meant to be 😎

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago

That phrasing is utterly dystopian

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

I disagree. Had to call the cops a few times to settle family disputes, they were always the best course of action.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I remember a woman from the US called the police because her son was having a mental breakdown and threatened to kill himself with his shotgun. Multiple police arrived and found the woman talking to his son who is inside his vehicle. The police saw the shotgun and promptly shot the son multiple times with the mother just outside the car in close proximity.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 33 points 9 months ago

Shooting KIDS is how we Protect The Children!

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago

God forbid they get the active shooter

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

I’m sure the officer thought it was a dog and ~~was excited at getting to shoot a defenseless animal~~ feared for his life

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Maybe the cop was actually Israel and thought Hamas was hiding in the kid.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

If the officer gave the kid a flyer saying "you're about to be shot", then it's ok.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Doubtful. Historically the police love shooting, lynching, and enslaving black ppl. Kinda their original job

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Obvious racism and corruption aside, the reason most often cited for not charging officers that irresponsibly discharge their weapons and harm civilians is that they were following the protocol they were taught as officers. Are there any attempts to get these protocols and training changed and if so, why aren't they being reported on in the news?

[-] DrMorose@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I would have liked to have been a bug on the wall to hear the grand jury deliberate this one. I mean I get the knee jerk reaction, but even so a kid who it seemingly was complying with instructions, gets shot anyway. How is that not negligent?

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
352 points (97.8% liked)

News

22838 readers
4350 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS