Dirt_Owl

joined 4 years ago
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 41 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

This is going to sound like cope but;

I think everyone underestimates just how fucking powerful Iran is. Just because Israel got a lucky surprise hit doesn't mean shit when this war has only just begun.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 25 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Lmao they desaturated the one on the right to make it look less colourful.

Anyway, just another example of the right being partially correct in realising things are getting worse, but being totally wrong as to the reason why.

What they're seeing capitalist cost cutting and the natural enshittification of capitalist properties as shareholders cut costs and take more control away from the people actually building their shit. The people now making decisions have no idea what works outside of how to make more money for doing less effort.

What they think they're seeing is those scary wokes demanding everything be more generic for... reasons? Maybe they think wokes think colour is racist or some dumb shit?

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

The 2010s in the West sucked if you weren't a cis white dude. It was also the time just after the 2008 crash when job hunting first started getting even more impossible and employers started getting more bold. It was the start of housing becoming unaffordable and young people were worse off than their parents for the first time in decades. People were complaining that their kids weren't leaving home at 18 like they did, and proceeded to collectively decide the late teens and young adults of the time were weak and spolied and needed to buy less avocado toast. Employers and landlords used this opportunity to gaslight people into worse conditions, and they haven't looked back since. I cannot overstate just how gaslit an entire generation became and the damage it did. Now you can look at burnt out Millennials and clue in to working hard not getting you anywhere. We didn't have that example, our parents got paid enough to buy their own houses at 20. So we worked hard and burnt out wondering why we weren't getting anywhere. To add insult to injury now people laugh about us being pushovers. Basically laughing at victims for being mentally abused by their elders when they were young and vulnerable.

But that's nothing compared to how much it sucked if you were in one of the countries the west was drone striking.

I guess if you were under 15, wealthy, white, Cis male and in the West at the time it might have seemed simpler. But for everyone else it sucked hard.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 6 points 4 hours ago

Confusion and overwhelming the public could be the goal. Although it could also just be a byproduct of US collapse

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago

Wish I was half as cool as Glados

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 1 points 15 hours ago

I'd probably turn into a bad animated comedy

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 30 points 15 hours ago

It would a shame if they were flooded with fake information

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 16 points 15 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 13 points 15 hours ago
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Also, just gotta say, the character design looks bland and corporate. Like an American commercial about to sell me Grubhub.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 60 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Don't you know? The more Western a woman dresses, the more free she is. Brittany Spears in the early 2000s for example, she dressed in all the latest Western fashions at the time, and was very free!

 

"M'latinas"

Bonus:

spoiler"M'ria"

 

tips fedora "M'laria"

 

Like they want to pretend young people are all coming to their side, but at the same time I guess they want to make it look like only "naive young college kids" are protesting. You can't have it both ways Chuds do you hate or love young ppl? Lol.

Anyway it's all kinds of people protesting, not just college kids. You know millennials are pissed at ice too and half of us still don't have a house and kids anyway so we got the time lol.

Hell, I remember during the climate protests here in Aus the police fucked up a grandmother.

Anyway, take my energy, protestors. I'm not US so I can't help. Good luck to any Hexbears out there, remember to leave your phone at home and to stay safe, but not too safe. Fart on a cop for me.

 
19
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net
 

The dodo (Raphus cucullatus) is an extinct flightless bird that was endemic to the island of Mauritius, which is east of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean. The dodo's closest relative was the also-extinct and flightless Rodrigues solitaire. The two formed the subtribe Raphina, a clade of extinct flightless birds that are a part of the group that includes pigeons and doves (the family Columbidae). The closest living relative of the dodo is the Nicobar pigeon (pictured below).

A white dodo was once thought to have existed on the nearby island of Réunion, but it is now believed that this assumption was merely confusion based on the also-extinct Réunion ibis and paintings of white dodos.

Most contemporary descriptions of the dodo are found in ship's logs and journals of the Dutch East India Company vessels that docked in Mauritius when the Dutch Empire ruled the island. These records were used as guides for future voyages. Few contemporary accounts are reliable, as many seem to be based on earlier accounts, and none were written by scientists. One of the earliest accounts, from van Warwijck's 1598 journal, describes the bird as follows:

Blue parrots are very numerous there, as well as other birds; among which are a kind, conspicuous for their size, larger than our swans, with huge heads only half covered with skin as if clothed with a hood. These birds lack wings, in the place of which 3 or 4 blackish feathers protrude. The tail consists of a few soft incurved feathers, which are ash coloured. These we used to call 'Walghvogel', for the reason that the longer and oftener they were cooked, the less soft and more insipid eating they became. Nevertheless their belly and breast were of a pleasant flavour and easily masticated.

One of the most detailed descriptions is by Herbert in A Relation of Some Yeares Travaille into Afrique and the Greater Asia from 1634:

First here only and in Dygarrois [Rodrigues] is generated the Dodo, which for shape and rareness may antagonize the Phoenix of Arabia: her body is round and fat, few weigh less than fifty pound. It is reputed more for wonder than for food, greasie stomackes may seeke after them, but to the delicate they are offensive and of no nourishment. Her visage darts forth melancholy, as sensible of Nature's injurie in framing so great a body to be guided with complementall wings, so small and impotent, that they serve only to prove her bird. The halfe of her head is naked seeming couered with a fine vaile, her bill is crooked downwards, in midst is the thrill [nostril], from which part to the end tis a light green, mixed with pale yellow tincture; her eyes are small and like to Diamonds, round and rowling; her clothing downy feathers, her train three small plumes, short and inproportionable, her legs suiting her body, her pounces sharpe, her appetite strong and greedy. Stones and iron are digested, which description will better be conceived in her representation.

The traditional image of the dodo is of a very fat and clumsy bird, but this view may be exaggerated. The general opinion of scientists today is that many old European depictions were based on overfed captive birds or crudely stuffed specimens. It has also been suggested that the images might show dodos with puffed feathers, as part of display behaviour. The Dutch painter Roelant Savery was the most prolific and influential illustrator of the dodo, having made at least twelve depictions, often showing it in the lower corners. A famous painting of his from 1626, now called Edwards's Dodo as it was once owned by the ornithologist George Edwards, has since become the standard image of a dodo. It is housed in the Natural History Museum, London. The image shows a particularly fat bird and is the source for many other dodo illustrations.

Edward's Dodo.

An Indian Mughal painting rediscovered in the Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg, in 1955 shows a dodo along with native Indian birds. It depicts a slimmer, brownish bird, and its discoverer Aleksander Iwanow and British palaeontologist Julian Hume regarded it as one of the most accurate depictions of the living dodo; the surrounding birds are clearly identifiable and depicted with appropriate colouring. It is believed to be from the 17th century and has been attributed to the Mughal painter Ustad Mansur. The bird depicted probably lived in the menagerie of the Mughal Emperor Jahangir, located in Surat, where the English traveller Peter Mundy also claimed to have seen two dodos sometime between 1628 and 1633.

A possible more accurate Dodo.

A 1631 Dutch letter (long thought lost, but rediscovered in 2017) is the only account of the dodo's diet, and also mentions that it used its beak for defence. The document uses word-play to refer to the animals described, with dodos presumably being an allegory for wealthy mayors:

The mayors are superb and proud. They presented themselves with an unyielding, stern face and wide open mouth, very jaunty and audacious of gait. They did not want to budge before us; their war weapon was the mouth, with which they could bite fiercely. Their food was raw fruit; they were not dressed very well, but were rich and fat, therefore we brought many of them on board, to the contentment of us all.

In addition to fallen fruits, the dodo probably subsisted on nuts, seeds, bulbs, and roots. It has also been suggested that the dodo might have eaten crabs and shellfish, like their relatives the crowned pigeons. Its feeding habits must have been versatile, since captive specimens were probably given a wide range of food on the long sea journeys. Oudemans suggested that as Mauritius has marked dry and wet seasons, the dodo probably fattened itself on ripe fruits at the end of the wet season to survive the dry season, when food was scarce; contemporary reports describe the bird's "greedy" appetite. The Mauritian ornithologist France Staub suggested in 1996 that they mainly fed on palm fruits, and he attempted to correlate the fat-cycle of the dodo with the fruiting regime of the palms.

Even though the rareness of the dodo was reported already in the 17th century, its extinction was not recognised until the 19th century. This was partly because, for religious reasons, extinction was not believed possible until later proved so by Georges Cuvier, and partly because many scientists doubted that the dodo had ever existed. It seemed altogether too strange a creature, and many believed it a myth. The bird was first used as an example of human-induced extinction in Penny Magazine in 1833, and has since been referred to as an "icon" of extinction.

73
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
 

Gottem lol

 

Picture of a baby with a Jesus beard and robe in a hospital bed mattress made of shrimp and tiny American flags and bibles. The bedframe is a crying soldier

The picture has 800 million likes

 

It's really cool that 99% of products aren't even what they say they are. Very cool to spend money on something and then get something totally different.

It doesn't matter where it's from or how much you spend either, everything is either low quality or not what it said it was.

I love capitalism

 

It just feels like that shit has ramped up. Like it's gotten particularly scummy and bad lately?

Capitalist countries have always covered everything in advertising, sure, but lately it seems even spaces that used to be safe from it are being poisoned by the most scummy adverts.

For example, I can't believe people are paying sometimes more than $1000 for a phone and then, boom, there is advertising in the settings menu.

I've also noticed that a lot of products and services are just openly scammy now too. Like really fucking bold in being greedy in a way that was at least slightly covert in the past. It's hard to explain what I mean, but just as example look at this:

"Pay us $200 for the opportunity to pay us another $150 and for a security app that probably is the same as the one the phone comes with, also customer support that we should be doing for free?"

The proliferation of AI. Windows adding advertising directly into their OS. You lift any modern device out of sleep mode and that shit has a push notification telling you to buy. Subscription streaming services that have the gall to charge you an overpriced subscription and then insert advertising and lock some shows behind a second paywall? This is just becoming like a parody you'd see on Futurama. It's just suffocating.

Oh yeah, one more thing. I've noticed there has been an increasing trend to shame people for not using a certain product. That's always been a thing, but it's getting worse. Like people saying that using a card to pay for things instead of a phone is for boomers. Like it's literally the same thing except if I use my card Google might get a little less predatory advertising data from me. People are increasingly not giving a shit that corporations are making a profile of what you buy, when and where you buy it. All data that can be used to flood you with advertising or even bought by scammers. You're treated as weird for caring about this kind of thing, even as the US is making collecting "lists" of trans people and "illegals".

I'm particularly worried that young people might be becoming more consumerist but I have to remind myself that when I was younger I was trapped in the same mindset. It just feels like there is less of a counterculture to consumerist BS these days.

view more: next ›