213
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Mystery surrounds an American woman who was found chained to a tree "screaming" in a forest in the western Indian state of Maharashtra.

Lalita Kayi, 50, was discovered a week ago in the dense forests of Sindhudurg district after her cries for help were heard by shepherds. They alerted the police who sawed off the chain and rescued her.

Ms Kayi, who appeared completely emaciated, was taken to hospital. Her physical health has since improved and, on Friday, she was moved to a psychiatric facility for further treatment, doctors treating her told the BBC.

In a written statement to the police, she has alleged that her husband "chained her and left her in the forest to die without food or water".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 152 points 1 month ago

In a written statement to the police, she has alleged that her husband "chained her and left her in the forest to die without food or water".

Hey, look at that, "mystery" solved within four paragraphs.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

Is that where you stopped reading? The mystery is her husband's whereabouts.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and that her version of events doesn't seem possible (no food and water for 40 days)

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

You reckon it's possible to lose track of time when chained to a tree while experiencing a psychotic episode?

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Did you read the article? They took her to a psychiatric hospital, and explicitly note there's a discrepancy about the time. I'm not saying she wasn't abused, or that her whole story is fake. Just, we all know you can't go 40 days without water. You can't go a week without water.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 10 points 1 month ago

It rains a lot in some parts of India, hence the existence of the jungle where she was chained.

Maybe she survived by drinking puddles of rainwater within her range of movement?

That may not be enough water to sustain her forever, but it would extend her survival.

That, and lack of water and food can lead to delirium which can lead to losing sense of time.

She might have picked "40 days" as a Bible reference. That's a pretty common number that represents a long time in western culture, even if they're not directly referencing the Bible.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's a lot of mights and maybes. I feel the article did an ok job at leaving those out and going only off of what is known. Which is exactly what the news is suppose to be

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I read the article. I understand the basis of your argument.

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You can’t survive 40 days without rehydration, but if you were given fluid intravenously, you can go without actually drinking anything. She states he injected her with something, maybe it was drugged, and maybe he hooked her up with an iv drip? I dunno. The whole situation is royally fucked up, any way you look at it

[-] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Being hooked up to an IV drip in the middle of a forest is surely something the article would have mentioned?

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree, I’m just speculating how it would be possible.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

That'd have to be a pretty large IV bag for 40 days. If he was trying to kill her he wouldn't have hung one up to begin with, and he wouldn't have come back to change the bags if he did hang one up for whatever reason.

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Perhaps the intent wasn’t to kill her, but only to keep her secure somewhere, and that’s why she had a tablet and phone and money and ID. (But why? Were they/was he in some kind of trouble, and they were (he was, since he left her literally chained to a fucking tree, implying she didn’t want to go/be with him (can’t blame her there) and he obviously couldn’t trust that she wouldn’t run off the first chance she got) planning on fleeing the country? Not enough money to buy a plane ticket, but a train ticket, maybe? Why else leave her with her ID?))

Maybe he did come back a few times and something happened to him where he couldn’t come back. (Why wouldn’t he come back? Did he get himself killed? What kind of trouble were they in, anyways??) (Although you’d think they’d have found an iv plug, or evidence of one. I guess it’s possible they purposely kept back information from being published, I know they do that sometimes.))

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
213 points (95.7% liked)

News

22831 readers
4128 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS