they didn't say they used any kind of LLM though? they literally just kept a copy of the assignment (in plain text) to reference. did you use an LLM to try to understand their comment? lol

there is no LLM involved in ryven's comment:

• open assignment
• select text
• copy text
• create text-i-will-turn-in.doc
• paste text without formatting
• work in this document, scrolling up to look at the assignment again
• fall for the "trap" and search like an idiot for anything relevant to assignment + frankie hawkes, since no formatting

i hope noone is dependent on your reading comprehension mate, or i'll have some bad news

You're a fucking moron and probably a child. They're telling a story from long before there were public LLMs.

There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example

• using an LLM to produce a draft, then
• Editing and correcting the LLM draft
• Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
• Correcting LLM style to your style

That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process