1014
submitted 1 month ago by carlytm@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] neoman4426@fedia.io 177 points 1 month ago

Like, even ignoring Musk's whole everything now, it's just one of the ugliest vehicles ever designed. Regular Teslas at least look okay if you ignore Musk himself, but the cybertruck looks like they just took a particularly untalented 1st grader's drawing of a vehicle and just went "Make that"

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

And that alone would be enough, but add to that the fact that they cost about 100 grand a piece, and yet they are essentially held together with bubblegum and shoestring. Bro, you paid a year's worth of salary for the average middle class person to drive around an ugly, falling-apart piece of shit created by a fascist. Yeah. We're gonna point and laugh at your dumb ass.

$100k is about the average household income in the US, the average single income is about $67k. So about a year and a half of the average wage. And median income is much lower (median household income is about $44k) indicating that high income households have a much larger effect on the average than low income households so the average middle class individual income should also be much lower than the average individual income.

[-] tibi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Exactly, the stainless steel "exoskeleton" is glued to plastic and pieces are coming unglued while driving. The towing thing is attached to a cast aluminum frame and multiple people have had it break while towing. It's a terrible car, and most owners are insufferable people.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There was this great meme going around years ago when the truck was announced that had a crayon drawing of it and “by Elon” written shakily in big letters like a child would use. I’ll see if I can find a link.

Edit: it’s on the shitty website we all left, but: https://old.reddit.com/r/Autos/comments/e0m4sg/the_original_concept_for_cybertruck_was_a_drawing/

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can also download the image and repost it to a lemmy instance like I'm doing here .... then no one has to go back to the old site

[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I'm just impressed that Elon finally made something worse than the Harambe rap.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago
[-] Tujio@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

For the love of god don't look it up. If you've made it this far without hearing it, just count your blessings. It's worse than you can possibly imagine.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You have no idea how much pain I'm willing to inflict on myself in order to get the reference. Your warning has been heard, but it will not be heeded

Edit: oof

[-] grue@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago
[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago

Aw shucks, I'm honored to have my foolishness immortalized

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 20 points 1 month ago

This is a masterpiece

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

So, now that you have the benefit of hindsight, what do you think? Was the warning justified? Is your relationship with curiosity still the same?

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

It was pretty cringe, the lyrics were god awful and they were way too liberal with the auto tune. Thankfully Elon is so unimaginative that he couldn't think of more than one verse for his war crime of a song so there weren't any surprises after ~10 seconds in. I would say the warning was justified, but a little overstated. I thought we were gonna be on Angelic 2 the Core levels of bad and it was just Friday bad. My relationship with my curiosity remains the same. As long as it isn't (real) gore, I'll probably click on it

[-] someacnt_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What is Harambe rep? I only know it is apparently "starting point of things going wrong"

It genuinely gives the Pontiac Aztec a run for its money in terms of “holy fuck that is ugly”

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

That thing makes the Aztec look positively sleek by comparison

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Don't devalue the Aztec for this. Yeah it was clad in tons of plastic and had a grill that was way too busy but it wasn't shockingly ugly like the cyber truck.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 10 points 1 month ago

I’m laughing here because I realized that’s almost certainly what happened, Elon mocked up a picture himself or dictating to someone else of a truck that he thought would look cool and then told the poor engineers and designers “make this.”

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

I can easily imagine that, too. I saw an early concept render that went around a decade ago or so when I worked in a design office, and we half- joked they’d accidentally released a low-poly model by mistake. Or it was some sort of weird joke we didn’t get.

It’s so ridiculous and broken, it has Musk’s fingerprints all over it (and good luck; fingerprints are near-permanent on that ludicrous metal finish they chose.)

[-] Alk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I actually like the general look of it, though it's done poorly. I want SO MUCH to drive a low-poly vehicle reminiscent of some 80's retrofuturism racing video game. But I fear the massive failure of the cyber truck will scare anyone away from taking a stab at the concept.

[-] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

The Hyundai Vision N 74 concept is a much better take on 80s retrofuturism imo.

[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Apart from the S which looks good despite being too big, do people really think Teslas look good? Ok the cybertruck is the ugliest one by far but model 3 and Y are not great.

[-] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

They're inoffensive, at least. Boring is better than hideous, I suppose.

[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

What do you mean by inoffensive? As in not dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists?

[-] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I mean that their design is conservative and does not take risks. Even pretty cars are dangerous, this is unrelated.

[-] idefix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Got it, thanks

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
1014 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12468 readers
785 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS