59
First ICBM used in any war???
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
59 points (98.4% liked)
GenZedong
4304 readers
88 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not confirmed. Don't just immediately take at face value what a British imperialist propaganda rag claims.
Ah yes, the same impeccably reliable source that gave us the Ghost of Kiev.
And the NK soldiers.
Rybar seems to confirm it
https://t.me/rybar/65567?single
CNN said it wasn't ICBM, quoting some "western official".
That's more of a technically than anything else. Yes, Russia has missiles classified as IRBMs that have a shorter range than ICBMs, but they still have very similar capabilities to ICBMs in terms of Multiple Re-entry Vehicles and being nuclear armed.
Inter Rontinental Ballistic Missile?
IRBM = Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile. A ballistic missile with a range between 3000-5500km. That's how it's been defined in all the missile treaties.
If not, it should be
Rybar aren't always the most reliable. Anyway, i'm not remotely qualified to speak on these things so i'll leave it to the experts to judge, and in the meantime wait for some official confirmation before jumping to conclusions.
Yeah for sure, I was just making a joke about using your longest range missible to hit your closest target, I wasn't trying to give legitimacy to the article or anything.
There's enough video out there to say it's highly likely some Multiple Re-entry Vehicles coming in from outside of the atmosphere hit Dnipro. The only weapons capable of that are ICBMs or IRBMs.
Video 1, alternative xcancel link
Video 2, alternative xcancel link
Video 3 alternative xcancel link
Video 4 alternative xcancel link
Video 5 on Reddit
These aren't Kinzhal or Iskander hits.
Maria Zakharova even had some staged phonecall during a press conference instructing her not to comment on the ballistic missile hits.
As i said, i'm not qualified to analyze footage and say what it is, but i wouldn't be surprised if the Russians used an intermediate range ballistic missile with some kind of MIRV warhead. I would be surprised if it was an ICBM because that's simply unnecessary. Either way, things are heating up. The Kiev Nazis and their fan club in the West keep insisting that it's ok to cross Russian red lines cause they won't do anything, and yet when Russia responds by matching escalation with escalation they cry foul and run to daddy USA. FAFO.
From what we have seen so far it does appears highly likely that it was indeed a recently developed and not yet known, until today, IRBM.
Putin clarified the weapon
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-21/ukraine-says-russia-launched-ballistic-missile-for-first-time/104632948