badposting
badposting is a comm where you post badly
This is not a !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net alternative. This is not a !memes@hexbear.net alternative. This is a place for you to post your bad posts.
Ever had a really shitty bit idea? Joke you want to take way past the point of where it was funny? Want to feel like a stand-up comedy guy who's been bombing a set for the past 30 minutes straight and at this point is just saying shit to see if people react to it? Really bad pun? A homemade cringe concoction? A cognitohazard that you have birthed into this world and have an urge to spread like chain mail?
Rules:
- Do not post good posts.
- Unauthorized goodposting is to be punished in the manner of commenting the phrase "GOOD post" followed by an emoji that has not yet been used in the thread
- Use an emoticon/kaomoji/rule-three-abiding ASCII art if the rations run out
- This is not a comm where you direct people to other people's bad posts. This is a comm where you post badly.
- This rule intentionally left blank.
- If you're struck for rule 3, skill issue, not allowed to complain about it.
Code of Conduct applies just as much here as it does everywhere else. Technically, CoC violations are bad posts. On the other hand: L + ratio + get ~~better~~ worse material bozo
view the rest of the comments
lmao gottem'
This is the case with most documentaries, I find. The sensationalism ends up ruining any truthfulness the documentary has, discrediting everything that's been told. And then you're left feeling like wrong information has taken root in your brain.
"Wait is that an actual fact I learned from a well-sourced, peer-reviewed study or something I saw in a documentary that turned out to have more incorrect information than true information? Are other people aware of this problem?"
Super Size Me is a prime example. Fast food isn't healthy. You absolutely should not be eating at McDonald's for every meal every day. But any information about nutrition concerning fast food has been tainted by this one documentary where the documentarian didn't disclose his alcoholism. Or that he was going through withdrawal while filming his movie. Or that he was inflating his numbers (allegedly he was getting 5,000 calories per day from McDonald's. In reality, it was more like 3,000).
How many people saw that movie and now have distorted views? Like do they think 5,000 calories is okay, so long as it's not McDonald's? Do they know you need to consume 5,000+ calories a day if you're a professional athlete or doing manual labor in freezing temperatures?
And that's just two examples (SSM and nature documentaries). And it doesn't get into bullshit like Project Veritas. When the revolution comes, we will ban true crime slop and replace all documentaries with high production recordings of university courses.