this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
518 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7212 readers
2219 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/47200357

One critic called the move “petulance beyond measure.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Guess I am a puritan for not wanting garbage that burns the planet in my everyday life I guess.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about the smaller open source models? Is the impact the same? I'm also wondering how much DeepSeek v4 changes this since the inference costs are several times lower than before. I'm sure there's still a lot of negative effects, but I'm wondering if the needle has moved at all.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until the datasets to train the models are curated and paid for, there won't be an ethical LLM.

I haven't looked into smaller models, but I'd wager that training the models is still power intensive.

And finally, how the LLM are used currently make them a net negative.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I understand the lack of ethics and I agree that their current mode of use is definitely a net negative, but was wondering more about the impact on the environment specifically.