Fuck AI

7221 readers

1648 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

119

AI chatbots fail medical misinformation test, returning inaccurate and fabricated advice (www.psypost.org)

submitted 22 hours ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They presented five generative AI chatbots—Gemini (2.0, Google; version available December 2024), DeepSeek (V3, High-Flyer; version available December 2024), Meta AI (Llama 3.3, Meta; version available December 2024), ChatGPT (3.5, OpenAI; version available November 2022) and Grok (2, xAI; version available August 2024)—with a series of closed- and open-ended prompts across five misinformation-prone categories.

Couldn't the researchers at least bother to use the latest models?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The study was done in Feb 2025 and they probably wrote the research proposal months before then, waited for approval / funding, etc. I don't know the process of how academia works but I imagine it to be very slow and bureaucratic.

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/16/4/e112695

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 0 points 44 minutes ago

Well they didn't even use the latest models in Feb 2025. They should've used DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o3-mini which use additional test time compute to arrive at better answers. They used GPT 3.5 which was about 2½ years old at the time.