this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
232 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

20355 readers
2121 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Imagine for a moment that you have never seen a photo of yourself , ever. Or anyone who is a human.

Your whole life you grew up in a white room with other animals like you in cages.


The problem with using 2d images in animal research is that it is assumed that animals understand what photos are.

But they probably don't. Or at least they don't rely on them or interpret them like we do. From a young age we watch tv. Read picture books. Look at photos albums. Even draw each other.

Animals don't have those experiences. Especially lab animals. They don't even have the experience of seeing billboards or posters.

This is a huge problem in forming any type of conclusions from animal research like this.

It's not impossible. But their perception is not like a humans.

They don't see a photograph of a bird and recognize it's their kind they are looking at.

They probably just think it's a screen or paper. Or something like that.

Because 2d is unnatural. They likely have limited ability to understand it's a representation.

Even humans have to learn to interpret representations (I can explain this more if someone asks).

How do birds identify each other?

Sounds they make ? Location? Movements ?

I'm not sure exactly but I doubt it's solely visual face recognition.

Even dogs use smell more than visual face recognition.

It's still an interesting study. But we just have to keep in mind the limitations I mentioned when interpreting the results.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They discuss this in the paper. Scientists aren't just randomly doing shit, they do actually put in thought.

Video Playback Techniques

Pigeons are social animals. They often communicate with each other by exhibiting distinct behaviors, such as courtship displays in front of potential mates. Accordingly, the occurrence of a courtship display indicates that a bird ‘recognizes’ the visual object as a potential mate [Shimizu, 1998; Partan et al., 2005; Patton et al., 2010]. In studies in our laboratory, as well as that of Barrie J. Frost and Nikolaus F. Troje [Frost et al., 1998], subject pigeons were exposed to live stimulus pigeons, videotaped pigeons, and photographs of pigeons to examine which visual features can trigger spontaneous courtship displays.

...

The significant results of video-playback stimuli further emphasize the potency of visual signals in courtship, considering the fact that the quality of a video-playback stimulus is much poorer compared to both real live stimulus birds and taxidermic models [D’Eath, 1998]. The video-playbacks were presented on a 2-dimensional monitor screen that was designed for the eyes of human observers. Video stimuli cannot provide depth information nor accurate color information for the avian visual system. However, the fact that video-playbacks can trigger courtship responses does not imply that the stimulus deficiencies are irrelevant for the expression of courtship responses.

Edit: Also as others have discussed, the Tumblr OP is misrepresenting the results of the study. Even in this study the pigeons showed clear preference patterns that indicate that they're understanding that it's a picture of a pigeon.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I never said the authors didn't discuss this. I was explaining it to people less familiar with this issue.

I realize the results support general face recognition. Pigeons are pretty good at visual discrimination on trained/experienced material.

But results should still be considered somewhat "unnatural" as the research was not on normally developed pigeons.

Interesting story: the university I attended used to have a professor who had pigeon housing on the roof of the psych building and would use wild pigeons for experiments. He fed the birds to coax them to participate.

Very ethical because essentially the birds volunteered. And high quality results because they were average wild pigeons in experience and ability.

However the university shut it all down.

This was before my time there but that's the story I was told.