this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

865 readers
387 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can’t get any archive sites to work so careful clicking on this, but here is the source: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cpafrancsewe_finance-investmentstrategy-riskmanagement-activity-7468202393348898816-Vvjt

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is the Terence McKenna model: everyone would get really high and bone each other, the prospect of "guarding" a woman was not worth it to a man as much as just having other partners, and the resulting paternity uncertainty (but also considerable likelihood) meant that all the men would be invested in raising all the children, and the community stays together that way.

Meanwhile it's been demonstrated that women will readily band together to help raise each other's children, with or without any prospect of genetic relatedness.

[–] Krem@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

everyone would get really high

why was it always "everyone got really high" with that guy