this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
292 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

7717 readers
1539 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't need an LLM to know the date ended ten seconds after they explained they were going to record the conversation for performance review

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s very likely that we’re ruling out a lot of people with whom we might have been happy, but who don’t meet the expectations on our list or our visual standards within the first 10 seconds. In this regard, meeting people in real life works better because we tend to engage more deeply with them (partly due to the smaller selection) than we do when briefly scanning a 10-word online profile with 5 pictures.

In my experience we also dismiss a massive number of people subconsciously in person, where seeing someone in passing is basically like the swiping step. Actually going on a date is the same in both approaches.

Actively dismissing might reinforce our visual biases, but as a trade off of being aware of more people who are interested in having a relationship.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

but as a trade off of being aware of more people who are interested in having a relationship.

Let me just jump in here for a moment:

That’s the theory. In the real world of modern online dating (of course, this is all just anecdotal evidence from me and a few colleagues, so take it with a grain of salt), there are also a lot of people on dating platforms who, for a wide variety of reasons, aren’t emotionally available for a relationship at all. Some are looking for no-strings-attached fun, others are going through a breakup, and still others are seeking attention and validation... In any case, not everyone you’re matched with is actually interested in a relationship or even in getting to know someone seriously. I’d even go so far as to say that this realization causes a bit more pain online than (as you correctly pointed out) in real life—where this also happens—because the platform operators naturally cultivate the expectation that “true love” (whatever that may mean to you) is just a click away.

I think we can perhaps agree on the following summary:

In theory, a platform where all adults who are interested in a relationship and are self-reflective can meet is a great idea because it expands the pool of available partners and allows you to weed out your personal no-goes beforehand without wasting time. In reality, however, due to the business model, our modern society, and human nature, quite a few pitfalls.

...and perhaps I just suck at online dating and therefore advise against it. After all it's a pretty personal topic. ^^

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Some are looking for no-strings-attached fun, others are going through a breakup, and still others are seeking attention and validation… In any case, not everyone you’re matched with is actually interested in a relationship

Those are all relationships. Not long term stable ones, sure, but they all fall under the relationship umbrella.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Depends on your definiton of relationship.

If we define the term broadly enough, every human interaction is a relationship because we have some kind of relationship with the individuals we interact with.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 4 days ago

Or we could acknowledge there are sexual, romantic, and other relationships that are commonly between two people and called relationships in the context of dating instead of diving headfirst into hyperbole.