this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
1133 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

20824 readers
483 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/1097575

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

The whole post is ridiculous. Putting cars on the water and inventing boats is pretty funny though.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I hope the water thing is /s

Why do you want that to be sarcasm?

Wouldn't you prefer that to be true??

You hope differently to me.

Water powered car's been invented more than just that once with the famous Stanley Meyer story. Y'know those blow torch thingies, that use water? Yeah, same basic principle. And remember in that special episode of Top Gear (I think it was maybe the Myanmar episode), where Hammond put a little water in his engine (in with the fuel) to give it more go at altitude? Same principle as many of the "water powered car"s use, where instead of (afaiu) electromagnetic alignment catalyst, they use chemical catalysts (and other starters and combustants etc), to which some eager naysayers throw the baby out with the bathwater and proclaim it all bunk because those designs were not using pure water. ... I'm not sure any use entirely pure water, do they? Didn't even Stanley Meyers design involve some kind of other chemical in the mix too? I'm not looking into it any further than is popularly known. I don't want to be mistaken for an inventor, attracting the attention of the ruthless unscrupulous sorts with a lot invested in their rentier ride. ;)

Amusing aside... can haz steam powered car too. ;) Too contrived to call that water powered? Hehe. Even a Stirling engine?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

I'm assuming they were hoping you don't actually believe it to be possible, not hoping that it's impossible.

As far as I know, there's no viable way to get water out of energy. All the different hydrocarbons we burn tend to produce water as a result of the burning process (CO2 and H2O being the results of a clean burning hydrocarbon).

The trouble is, you need energy to break bonds between atoms, and energy gets released as bonds are created. H2O has some pretty strong bonds and there's nothing you can easily make it react with to get more or stronger bonds in there.

Water can be used in internal combustion engines to cool down the combustion chambers if you're running super high performance, but that doesn't meant water injection is adding energy from water, you'd still be burning more fuel to get more power.

[–] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

They make cars which run on hydrogen which you can get from water but that process is so inefficient they opt to get the hydrogen from natural gas instead thus defeating the entire purpose. Overall we have better tech now than "running a car on water" and doing that doesn't help the bigger problem of unsustainable use of energy

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The only practical way to get power from water is to break it apart and then burn the hydrogen, and it takes more energy to break it apart than you'll get back.