this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
669 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

20830 readers
190 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

controlling nuclear waste for hundreds of thousands of years is impossible

Purchase 10 sq miles iround a mine Fill below any water table, fill with concrete

Deep drill past aquifers drop waste in hole.

Not cheap, but you can really do that.

any rationalization when cheaper and regenerative options exist is idiotic.

Ignoring options with the benefits of 24x7 steady state generation is far more idiotic.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Purchase 10 sq miles iround a mine Fill below any water table, fill with concrete

And that concrete is 100% carbon neutral and will never be affected by earthquakes.

Deep drill

When drilling is suddenly OK, then forego the nuclear reactor and go straight to geothermal.

Ignoring options with the benefits of 24x7 steady state generation is far more idiotic.

Tell that to your nuclear waste buddies who oppose geothermal.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

100% carbon neutral and will never be aff

  • edit: needed a space

deep enough, below the water table. (if it even exists where you pick a location) no big deal. There's worse things down there already than moderately low level radioactive metals. It's not like we aren't fracking underneath peoples homes now. releasing dangerous gasses, causing earthquakes, yada yada. That's the other good part about the deep desert: it's already inhospitable enough that people don't gather there uniformly in great numbers. If you buy up some land and cordon it off, it's not really screwing with people. What if you put it deep in the Sahara?

When drilling is suddenly OK, then forego the nuclear reactor and go straight to geothermal.

Geo is a great idea, sadly they have trouble getting it to scale, and locating hot enough pockets proves elusive. If you're in volcanic areas, medium-sized geothermal is amazing. IIRC Iceland uses it to great effect but it doesn't work just anywhere. We can't drill so deep that it gets hot enough to make a difference; you need to find a spot where the crust is already thin.

Now that's not to be confused with geothermal at the house level for heatpumps, that is straight up awesome but works on a very different concept and can't really scale at all... well it would be nice if all these fucking datacenters would use that instead of evaporative loops. but that's a different story.

  • edit 2 looking at the carbon footprint of concrete, you'd spend more carbon drilling the hole and getting the waste to the hole than the plug you used to fill it. and you'd be able to store decades of terawatts of energy refuse in that hole