this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
113 points (96.7% liked)

Slop.

748 readers
358 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] getoffthatchronic@lemdro.id 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What happened to Soviet and Cuban property law prior to workers en masse gaining the ability to buy a vacation home for their family? Do you think that the US land system can just be loosened up to allow poors into it? That goes contrary to its pricing through scarcity...

[โ€“] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Do you think that the US land system can just be loosened up to allow poors into it? That goes contrary to its pricing through scarcity...

Practically speaking, the vast majority of Americans are housed already. They simply don't own those dwellings. It would be easy (and completely uncontroversial, at least among proletarians) to expropriate those dwellings and turn them over to their residents. Regarding unhoused people, it's a well-established fact that they are massively outnumbered by empty dwellings being held as speculative real-estate assets, which should also be expropriated. I don't really see what advantage there is in expropriating personal residences in use by their owners that would further the goal of American land reform.