Slop.

In my revolution, we will simply rebuild meemaw and pep pep's house slightly smaller every night while they sleep until they voluntarily relinquish it to the state because it feels too small.

does this "socialist" not know the difference between personal and private property?

The Goal of Socialism is to Carpet Bomb the First World

Lmao “the goal isn’t abstract, allow me to show you how unnuanced this all is. Your parents are basically Feudal lords.”

Think this person just hates their family, rather than any ideological commitment to socialism.

Yeah, repossessing my parents house will definitely be the first act of a socialist administration. Anything else (taxing and/or nationalizing corporations, wealth taxes and seizure of wealth when taxes are evaded, using the wealth from these acts to address basic needs and create jobs for all) is opportunism

gimme the quilts meemaw

i love how in this hypothetical you don't own anything and only the older people you know own shit.

Socialism is when no possessive apostrophe.

So, funny thing. The most likely entity to seize a person's house is a bank, under capitalism.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm

The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.

The theoretical conclusions of the Communists are in no way based on ideas or principles that have been invented, or discovered, by this or that would-be universal reformer.

They merely express, in general terms, actual relations springing from an existing class struggle, from a historical movement going on under our very eyes. The abolition of existing property relations is not at all a distinctive feature of communism.

All property relations in the past have continually been subject to historical change consequent upon the change in historical conditions.

The French Revolution, for example, abolished feudal property in favour of bourgeois property.

The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.

In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.

Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.

Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?

But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.

Weird how they always talk about how we should take over houses of everyone, including your aunts house and your dogs house, but never wanna talk about how I will send them to the great hexagonal (unaffiliated with hexbear) gulag, where they will be building hexagonal housing, for all the ultras to live in.

The goal of socialism isn't to "make things better" in an abstract way, it's to forcibly expropriate property owners - yes, your mother's house and land, your aunt's business, the bear caves, gopher holes, birds nests, your Xbox, your toothbrush - and trying to pretend otherwise isn't pragmatism, it's opportunism

my mum have a 2 bedroom flat right above an urban highway

When you think the means are the ends you become the Khmer Rouge.