this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
380 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

14084 readers
375 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 125 points 1 week ago (11 children)

As much as I love a good Ten Minutes Hate directed at some carbrain too lazy to walk 4km, it seems I'm going to have to be the one to point out that it's entirely possible that this person's route to work is far too dangerous to walk, let alone cycle.

Just look at that strip of paint some of you are calling a bike lane. Maybe you would be willing to risk your life squeezing amongst the monster trucks on a bike, but I certainly wouldn't. And walk? Breathing all those tailpipe fumes for 30-60min? Hell no. This person may well be looking at 4km of car-exclusive road to get to work.

So instead of ripping into this poor soul for being lazy, maybe we should be considering the very real possibility that their options are limited by poor infrastructure/planning/politics.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

With the speed of the traffic being nearly none, I think cycling would be pretty safe in the shoulder there. I wonder what it's like in the morning

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 71 points 1 week ago

Not Just Bikes has pointed out in numerous videos places where the distance is walkable/bikeable but totally unsafe to walk or bike. Carbrain infrastructure is not just bad because it centers cars, but because it excludes every other option.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very sarcastic comment, but if the traffic is bad enough then it becomes safe to cycle again because of how little anyone in a car can move.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually, that's a pretty good strategy. I quite like cycling around in heavy traffic for exactly this reason.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 week ago

I use an electric bike, so I could easily go to 30km/h and while the city has a limit of 50, I usually go at pace because of the amount of transit.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The aggravating part isn't not the lazy, but their complaint that they are building more density surrounding it's area. A less carbrained person would see that as an opportunity to push for bike lanes and public transit.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Yes, even get the developers to pay a contribution as part of the permit.

I get the impression - or what seems most likely given their ridiculous situation of driving at average of walking pace - that they'll be asking instead for one more lane, and it won't be dedicated for bus or bike or tram.

At the stage they seem to have reached I think it seems quite fair to ridicule the whole city and everyone who has had the power to vote there for the past generation which presumably includes the ooop.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

That is just a narrow shoulder, you're asking to die riding a bike on that.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

The traffic is moving at walking speed. It's definitely not dangerous to ride bike there...

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The obvious solution is to put your bike on your car's bike rack, pull out across both lanes of traffic, then take your bike off your car and ride from there.

/s just in case

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

it’s entirely possible that this person’s route to work is far too dangerous to walk, let alone cycle.

If only there was some kind of enlongated multi-passanger vehicle they could use

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

proceeds to wait 45 minutes in traffic AND 15 minutes additional for the bus

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's funny, because I cut ten minutes off my thirty minute commute via the HOV lane by carpooling, and I see plenty of Metro buses on the same route.

[–] magguzu@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 week ago

How do you know there is?

And if there is I don't see a dedicated lane.

I would still bus on principle because I'm a masochist and stubborn. But I get it when people don't if the infrastructure isn't good.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

This comment is way too reasonable to exist in this community

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

That's not even designed to be a bike lane it's just the edge of the road

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

That's not even designed to be a bike lane it's just the edge of the road