this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
366 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck AI

5004 readers
917 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a study published on Monday by the peer-reviewed journal Patterns, data scientist Alex de Vries-Gao estimated the carbon emissions from electricity used by AI at between 33 million and 80 million metric tons.

That higher figure would put it above last year's totals for Chile (78m tons), Czechia (78m tons), Romania (71m tons), and New York City (48m tons, including both CO2 and other greenhouse gases).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Those numbers comparing ChatGPT with Netflix do not seem plausible to me.

Streaming a video is basically sending a file over the internet, while ChatGPT requires multiple GPUs to run.

I found different numbers online:

  • ChatGPT: 0.3 to 3 Wh per query
  • Netflix: 77 Wh per hour (source)

By this rough calculation, your estimate is quite a few magnitudes wrong. It is maybe 100-500 ChatGPT queries that are equal to watching Netflix, not 100.000.