this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
500 points (95.8% liked)

Science Memes

17881 readers
2600 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 15 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Ehh. I'm not sure it's very constructive to make a topological argument from a debate people usually think about as a linguistic one.

[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 1 points 40 minutes ago

Fields dont need to be that isolated. In the end its arbitrary, so why not accept arguments of all perspectives?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But saying that to make a hole in a sphere, you need to make two holes in the sphere is funny.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago

Very good observation. Now what about a hollow sphere?

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago

In germany we say alles hat ein Ende nur die Wurst hat zwei

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

I like to think of this particular example as a sort of reminder that we need to be specific on what grounds we are arguing. Colloquially, and for the sake of practicality, the straw has two holes. You would one hole or the other is in the drink, or clogged. But topologically, yes, there is only one hole.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

Except maybe to illustrate the necessity of various disciplines, as this is a maths problem and not a linguistics one.

Arguing the linguistics of this is like arguing over astrology.