this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
721 points (91.4% liked)

Science Memes

18059 readers
1914 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And they're saying that's you.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well the meme is still stupid. :) Basically trying to say that only people who studied science are qualified to say they like science.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Their face doesn't go 🫤 at the sight of hard math & theory? The statement's that it does.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe they're trying to say that science (at least, Phys) without advanced calculus is "just" outreach or popularization. And they're right, even if your sensibility can't accept it.

[–] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Does an F1 driver need to understand and utilize advanced calculus on the track to do well? I feel that concepts like grip/slip, aero, centripetal force, and weight transfer are intimately linked to an intuition for physics, even if they aren't being understood at a calculus-requiring level by the driver.

Yet, I would struggle to call that situation "outreach" or "popularizarion." I would still consider the driver's understanding of physics as tangential to science.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

IMO you need basic calculus to understand the laws of physics. Like at least to understand that the derivative is the rate of change, the integral is the area under the curve, the fundamental theorem(s) of calculus, and what limits are. You don't necessarily need to do δ-ε proofs, but at least the qualitative stuff is worth teaching.

I took algebra-based physics for my music degree and then calculus-based physics for my engineering degree. Algebra-based physics explained basically nothing for me and had zero impact on my understanding of the world. Calculus-based physics will stick with me forever.

Like I'm with you that outreach is important and should not be dismissed, but I really don't see the utility of algebra-based physics.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A F1 driver is not a scientist. And no, you're wrong.

[–] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I know they're not a scientist. But to say they have no grasp or interest in science would also be wrong, so I think the answer lies somewhere in the gray area, and not this black and white perspective presented in OP.

You can be enthusiastic and have a simplified-but-robust understanding of some kinds of science, that doesn't make you less of an enjoyer. But there are certainly people who only understand at a surface level, yet pretend to be immersed in the material and demand to be treated like experts.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Most F1 drivers have no education beyond high school. Lance Stroll barely has a grasp of grammar.