this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
249 points (92.2% liked)

World News

53271 readers
2947 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The west is really pushing for the Shah to take over, huh

There were some reports from Arak that workers started taking over factories. But no, what gets reported are some fringe monarchists.

Btw, the Iranian communist party talks of 600ish dead and 11000 arrested. Those seem more believable numbers. Protests seem to still be ongoing on a large scale, I hope they bring down the Ayatollah regime. All power to the workers!

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

A single video shows ~400 bodies piled up in one Tehran suburb.

What the honest fuck are your talking about 600ish sounds more believable? More believable based on what? Based on you dick riding the Ayatollah?

[–] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Based on other protests, probably?

Apart from that, killing 12000 people is a huge effort even for a military using artillery and whatnot. If you have some military insight, just think of the logistics.

Or compare to the massacres Nazis did in WW2. Extreme cases like the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising had something like 20000 people killed on site, so you see how believing that they pulled of more than half of that here, without all the supporting context the nazis had, is not a given.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

Protests have occurred in approximately 180 towns and cities.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

If the protests were widespread enough it's not impossible to approach those kinds of numbers. That's ~20 cities of 600 deaths spread over 2+ weeks. Other modern protest crackdowns have also been more about asserting power in full view of the world. This is a regime fully blocking media accountability while potentially fighting for its life.

The Nazis were also doing that with mostly bolt action rifles and some tanks and inaccurate artillery, mainly benefitting from shooting 430,000 people in a concentrated ghetto. Drones and modern weapons are much more deadly and are being deployed against cities with populations in the millions.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Uuh, just shoot into the masses of the protests? The mass panic will also kill many indirectly.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As far as I could tell the Shah guy isn't actually intent on becoming a monarch (he was fairly critical of his dad) but wants to help Iran transition towards democracy. How he does that, no clue.

Still, apparently that guy is the dude most Iranians trust to take over. I say most, but it's still barely 30% iirc; Iranians are pretty disillusioned with their (potential) leaders at the moment.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reza_Pahlavi,_Crown_Prince_of_Iran

Investigations by Haaretz and TheMarker reported the existence of an Israeli-linked influence network aimed at shaping Iranian public opinion and promoting Pahlavi as a potential post–Islamic Republic leader. The reports claim the network was operated by a private entity funded by Israeli government resources, used artificial intelligence, and relied on fake online accounts, particularly Persian-language profiles. The network allegedly recruited Persian speakers who reposted content from Reza Pahlavi.[99]

Whether or not he claims so, he's pro-US and pro-Israel so they are pushing hard to restore the monarchy. Any support you see for him is likely astroturfed

Edit: besides, trusting an autocrat who promises to "transition to democracy at some point in the future" is the stupidest thing one can do during a popular uprising

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

His support numbers are certainly somewhat pushed up.

However, on Reddit (on the subreddit r/newiran, which I must note is disproportionately pro-Pahlavi) someone proposed a method of verifying how much of his support genuinely came from Iran.

They measured the drop in viewership of his videos at the beginning of the Internet blackout. They concluded that most viewers were from Iran, since traffic dropped several times with the blackout.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pahlavi himself iirc never ruled and criticised his father who did, so not sure how correctly he can be characterized as an "autocrat". He might well be genuine. But yes, it's obvious that there's foreign countries who'd much prefer him over the theocracy.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

An (absolute) monarchy is by definition an autocracy, and a monarch an autocrat. And we don't know whether he wants to rule as Shah or not based on his statements, because even if he did, it would be in his best interest to deny it and promise democratization. So again: trusting an autocrat at their word, especially if they are promising to bring you democracy if you just let them take the reigns first, is foolishly naïve.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Maybe the Shah can run for President if the theocracy goes away...right?

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The son of the shah (he hasn't ruled as a shah, his father did) is a seemingly smart and politically competent person, who seems outwardly like a liberal democrat (but one can't see into people).

His problem is that he isn't part of a militant organization, and he was brought up in peace and plenty. They listen to his words and respect him, but he may not have the kind of colleagues to bring down the (quite bloodthirsty) ayatollah's regime. :( Overthrowing a country requires lots of organized people who are considerably less polite.

Btw, the Iranian communist party talks of 600ish dead and 11000 arrested.

They don't update their sites as often as news organizations, and don't have so many contacts to intgrate information from.

MeK - the People's Mojahedin (leftist, terrorist tactics, based in emigration, in south-eastern Europe) - updated their site yesterday, says death toll "over 3000". But it took them a day to get the information out, since they speak of Monday in the text but published on Tuesday.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The son of the shah is a USA stooge. Zero credibility.