Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Not very well. At least not for large communities, or ones that want to live modern lives in the developed world.
Yes it's quite possible to have small communities where everyone knows each other, then you can enforce rules through consensus and social pressure.
But it would be impossible to have large societies or to live in a modern developed world with no hierarchical structures.
There's a lot of unsaid assumptions going on here. If you're talking about turning our society completely without any preparation, I'd agree. If you're talking about having similar levels of healthcare or I strongly disagree
Thats kind of what I'd assume but I've never talked about it with someone knowledgeable.
Wouldn't viewing a large community as a federation of small ones solve the problem? Federations pop up when needed. When they don't reach consensus, they break up into smaller parts, some of which give the idea a try?
Seems very natural to me, similar to how open source repositories interconnect. People collaborating, differing of opinion, forking or restarting.
That works in isolation, but a federation where everyone is free to cooperate or refrain from doing so will always be weaker militarily than a neighbor who can press everyone into the army.
So any anarchist federation that is successful enough will attract outside aggressors who want to expand, take their shit or force them to join.
True, but history has some examples of how to possibly deal with this e.g. Makhno's defence of the free territory, or the Zapatistas making use of the isolation of the jungle.